Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32612851›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of retina and vitreous2020

Optical coherence tomography features of neovascularization in proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review.

Sara Vaz-Pereira, Tiago Morais-Sarmento, Raquel Esteves Marques

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Peripheral retinal lesions in diabetic retinopathy on ultra-widefield imaging.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sara Vaz-PereiraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Norte, EPE-Hospital de Santa Maria, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-035 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6125-5486
Tiago Morais-SarmentoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital do Espírito Santo de Évora EPE, Évora, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2648-3496
Raquel Esteves MarquesDepartment of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Norte, EPE-Hospital de Santa Maria, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-035 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1445-7592
University of Lisbon · PTHospital do Espírito Santo · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness due to diabetic macular edema (DME) or complications of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a noninvasive imaging technique well established for DME but less used to assess neovascularization in PDR. Developments in OCT imaging and the introduction of OCT angiography (OCTA) have shown significant potential in PDR.

objectivesTo describe the tomographic features of PDR, namely of neovascularization, both of the optic disc (NVD) and elsewhere (NVE), intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (IRMA), retinal nonperfusion areas (NPA), status of the posterior vitreous, vitreoschisis and vitreous and subhyaloid/sub-ILM hemorrhages. DATA SOURCES: Electronic database search on PubMed and EMBASE, last run on December 19th 2019. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA PARTICIPANTS AND

interventionsPublications assessing OCT and/or OCTA findings in PDR patients. All study designs were allowed except for case-reports, conference proceedings and letters. STUDY APPRAISAL: Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies was used for purposes of risk of bias assessment.

resultsFrom the 1300 studies identified, 283 proceeded to full-text assessment and 60 were included in this comprehensive review. OCT was useful in detecting NVD and NVE, such as in characterizing disease activity and response to laser and/or anti-VEGF therapies. The absence of posterior vitreous detachment seemed determinant for neovascular growth, with the posterior hyaloid acting as a scaffold. OCTA allowed a more detailed characterization of the neovascular complexes, associated NPA and disease activity, allowing the quantification of neovessel area and flow index. However, changes in OCTA blood flow signal following local therapies did not necessarily correlate with structural regression. Widefield and ultra-widefield OCTA were highly sensitive in the detection of PDR, adding value to disease staging and monitoring. Compared to fluorescein angiography, OCTA was more sensitive in detecting microvascular changes indicating disease progression. LIMITATIONS: Publication languages were restricted. Most included studies were observational and non-comparative. Risk of bias regarding case representativeness.

conclusionsOCT-based retinal imaging technologies are advancing rapidly and the trend is to be noninvasive and wide-field. OCT has proven invaluable in diagnosing, staging and management of proliferative diabetic disease with daily application in clinical and surgical practices.

Indexed as

Diabetes mellitusDiabetic retinopathyDiagnostic imagingOptical coherence tomography angiographyProliferative diabetic retinopathyRetinal neovascularizationTomography, optical coherence

Identifiers

PMID32612851
PMCPMC7322867
OpenAlexW3040127377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.