Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32612752›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2020

Software tools for 3D nuclei segmentation and quantitative analysis in multicellular aggregates.

Filippo Piccinini, Tamas Balassa, Antonella Carbonaro, Akos Diosdi, Timea Toth, Nikita Moshkov, Ervin A Tasnadi, Peter Horvath

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Filippo PiccininiIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Cancer Research Hospital, Meldola, FC, Italy.
Tamas BalassaSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre (BRC), Szeged, Hungary.
Antonella CarbonaroDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Bologna, Italy.
Akos DiosdiSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre (BRC), Szeged, Hungary.
Timea TothSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre (BRC), Szeged, Hungary.
Nikita MoshkovSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre (BRC), Szeged, Hungary.
Ervin A TasnadiSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre (BRC), Szeged, Hungary.
Peter HorvathSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Biological Research Centre (BRC), Szeged, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today, we are fully immersed into the era of 3D biology. It has been extensively demonstrated that 3D models: (

Indexed as

3D SegmentationCancer SpheroidsMicroscopyOncologySingle-cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID32612752
PMCPMC7303562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.