ArticlePolish journal of radiology2020
The relationship between FDG PET/CT-defined metabolic parameters and the histopathological subtype of oesophageal carcinomas.
Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Comparative Analysis of F-18 FDG PET-Based Metabolic Parameters in the Differential Diagnosis of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma.World journal of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Volumetric Evaluation of StagingMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2022Article
- CanCancers · 2022Article
- Relationship betweenKorean journal of radiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ( MATERIAL AND
methodsImages and clinical course data of 57 patients who were diagnosed with EC and treated in our hospital between 2009 and 2016 were evaluated in a retrospective manner. PET/CT images were re-analysed in terms of metabolic parameters, and observations were compared with histological subtypes.
resultsNo significant difference was observed between histological subtypes with SUV
conclusionsMetabolic tumour volume was related with histological subtype of OC, but clinical staging, TLG, and SUV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.