Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32612579›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020

A New Alignment-Free Whole Metagenome Comparison Tool and Its Application on Gut Microbiomes of Wild Giant Pandas.

Jiuhong Dong, Shuai Liu, Yaran Zhang, Yi Dai, Qi Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Gut Microbiota in Dholes During Estrus.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiuhong DongState Key Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Shuai LiuInstitute of Physical Science and Information Technology, Anhui University, Hefei, China.
Yaran ZhangState Key Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yi DaiState Key Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Qi WuState Key Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The comparison of metagenomes is crucial for studying the relationship between microbial communities and environmental factors. One recently published alignment-free whole metagenome comparison method based on k-mer frequencies, Libra, showed higher resolutions than the present fastest method, Mash, on whole metagenomic sequencing reads, but it did not perform as well on the assembled contigs. Here, we developed a new alignment-free tool, KmerFreqCalc, for the comparison of the whole metagenomic data, which first calculated the frequencies of both forward and reverse complementary sequences of k-mers like Mash and then computed the cosine distance between the samples based on k-mer frequency vectors like Libra. We applied KmerFreqCalc on the assembled contigs of the gut microbiomes of wild giant pandas and compared the results to Libra and Mash. The results indicated that KmerFreqCalc was able to detect the subtle difference between giant panda samples caused by seasonal diet change, showing better clustering than Libra and Mash. Therefore, KmerFreqCalc has high resolution and accuracy for assembled contigs, being very suitable for comparison of samples with low dissimilarity.

Indexed as

cosine distancegut microbiomesk-mer frequenciesreverse complementary sequencewhole metagenome comparisonwild giant pandas

Identifiers

PMID32612579
PMCPMC7309450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.