Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32612362›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2020

Composite Outcomes of Mortality and Readmission in Patients with Heart Failure: Retrospective Review of Administrative Datasets.

Afsaneh Roshanghalb, Cristina Mazzali, Emanuele Lettieri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Afsaneh RoshanghalbDepartment of Management, Economics & Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1534-8179
Cristina MazzaliQuality and Clinical Risk Unit, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2645-9939
Emanuele LettieriDepartment of Management, Economics & Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1235-989X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundControlling the quality of care through readmissions and mortality for patients with heart failure (HF) is a national priority for healthcare regulators in developed countries. In this longitudinal cohort study, using administrative data such as hospital discharge forms (HDFs), emergency departments (EDs) accesses, and vital statistics, we test new covariates for predicting mortality and readmissions of patients hospitalized for HF and discuss the use of combined outcome as an alternative.

methodsLogistic models, with a stepwise selection method, were estimated on 70% of the sample and validated on the remaining 30% to evaluate 30-day mortality, 30-day readmissions, and the combined outcome. We followed an extraction method for any-cause mortality and unplanned readmission within 30 days after incident HF hospitalization. Data on patient admission and previous history were extracted by HDFs and ED dataset.

resultsOur principal findings demonstrate that the model's discriminant ability is consistent with literature both for mortality (AUC=0.738, CI (0.729-0.748)) and readmissions (AUC=0.578, CI (0.562-0.594)). Additionally, the discriminant ability of the composite outcome model is satisfactory (AUC=0.675, CI (0.666-0.684)).

conclusionHospitalization characteristics and patient history introduced in the logistic models do not improve their discriminant ability. The composite outcome prediction is led more by mortality than readmission, without improvements for the comprehension of the readmission phenomenon.

Indexed as

administrative health dataheart failuremortalitypatient readmission

Identifiers

PMID32612362
PMCPMC7322138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.