Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32612324›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of psychological medicine

Frequency and Duration of Course of ECT Sessions: An Appraisal of Recent Evidence.

Jagadisha Thirthalli, Shalini S Naik, Girish Kunigiri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of psychological medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jagadisha ThirthalliDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India.
Shalini S NaikDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India.
Girish KunigiriConsultant Psychiatrist, Bradgate Mental Health Unit, Leicester, England, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

methodThis paper aims to review the recent literature regarding factors influencing the frequency and number of sessions during a course of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for different psychiatric disorders. We systematically reviewed English-language papers of clinical trials of ECT published since the year 2000 in terms of frequency and number of sessions of ECT.

resultsNone of the 30 studies meeting our inclusion criteria were specifically designed to study frequency or number of sessions of ECT. A preliminary inference may be drawn regarding the number of sessions from the information available in these papers. For depression, patients receiving brief-pulse ECT needed fewer sessions than those receiving ultra-brief ECT when these were delivered at 8-times the threshold with unilateral electrode placement or at 2.5-times the threshold with bilateral placement. For schizophrenia, those receiving bifrontal ECT and ECT at 4-times the threshold-level stimulus needed fewer sessions than those receiving bitemporal ECT and 2-times the threshold-level stimulus, respectively. There were no clinical trials of the frequency of ECT sessions. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: As there is a dearth of studies specifically examining frequency and number of ECT sessions, broad recommendations from professional bodies should continue to guide practice.

Indexed as

Electroconvulsive therapyfrequencyschedule

Identifiers

PMID32612324
PMCPMC7320735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.