Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32612245›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Cochlea-inspired design of an acoustic rainbow sensor with a smoothly varying frequency response.

Angelis Karlos, Stephen J Elliott

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Robustness of subwavelength devices: a case study of cochlea-inspired rainbow sensors.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angelis KarlosInstitute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. A.Karlos@soton.ac.uk.
Stephen J ElliottInstitute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
University of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of physical arrangements for acoustic rainbow sensors have been suggested, where the aim is to separate different frequency components into different physical locations along the sensor. Although such spatial discrimination has been achieved with several designs of sensor, the resulting frequency responses at a given position along the sensor are generally not smoothly varying. In contrast, the cochlea provides an interesting natural example of a rainbow sensor, which has an exponential frequency distribution and whose response does vary smoothly with frequency. The design of a rainbow sensor is presented that has a number of discrete resonators and an exponential frequency distribution. We discuss the conditions for a smoothly varying frequency response in such a sensor, as part of a broader design strategy. It is shown that the damping within the resonators determines the trade-off between the frequency resolution and the number of elements required to achieve a smooth response. The connection is explained between this design and that of an effective acoustic absorber. The finite number of hair cells means that the cochlea itself can be thought of as being composed of discrete units and the conditions derived above are compared with those that are observed in the cochlea.

Identifiers

PMID32612245
PMCPMC7330050
OpenAlexW3040309032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.