ArticleScientific reports2020
Genome-wide investigation of gene-cancer associations for the prediction of novel therapeutic targets in oncology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting intracellular mRNA mJournal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Challenges and opportunities for oncology drug repurposing informed by synthetic lethality.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
- SIGEL: a context-aware genomic representation learning framework for spatial genomics analysis.Genome biology · 2025Article
- PINNED: identifying characteristics of druggable human proteins using an interpretable neural network.Journal of cheminformatics · 2023Article
- OncoRTT: Predicting novel oncology-related therapeutic targets using BERT embeddings and omics features.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Omics Data and Data Representations for Deep Learning-Based Predictive Modeling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- The promise of automated machine learning for the genetic analysis of complex traits.Human genetics · 2022Review
- dCas9-VPR-mediated transcriptional activation of functionally equivalent genes for gene therapy.Nature protocols · 2022Review
- Article
- Article
- Topological-Similarity Based Canonical Representations for Biological Link Prediction.IEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformaticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A major cause of failed drug discovery programs is suboptimal target selection, resulting in the development of drug candidates that are potent inhibitors, but ineffective at treating the disease. In the genomics era, the availability of large biomedical datasets with genome-wide readouts has the potential to transform target selection and validation. In this study we investigate how computational intelligence methods can be applied to predict novel therapeutic targets in oncology. We compared different machine learning classifiers applied to the task of drug target classification for nine different human cancer types. For each cancer type, a set of "known" target genes was obtained and equally-sized sets of "non-targets" were sampled multiple times from the human protein-coding genes. Models were trained on mutation, gene expression (TCGA), and gene essentiality (DepMap) data. In addition, we generated a numerical embedding of the interaction network of protein-coding genes using deep network representation learning and included the results in the modeling. We assessed feature importance using a random forests classifier and performed feature selection based on measuring permutation importance against a null distribution. Our best models achieved good generalization performance based on the AUROC metric. With the best model for each cancer type, we ran predictions on more than 15,000 protein-coding genes to identify potential novel targets. Our results indicate that this approach may be useful to inform early stages of the drug discovery pipeline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.