Trial reportScientific reports2020
Evaluation of enhanced recovery after surgery program components implemented in laparoscopic appendectomy: prospective randomized clinical study.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03754777 (Evaluation of Modified Enhanced Recovery Program in Emergency Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Modified Enhanced Recovery Program in Emergency Surgery
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of enhanced recovery pathways on patient-reported outcomes after abdominal surgery: a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Pooled it
- Rapid rehabilitation effect on complications, wound infection, anastomotic leak, obstruction, and hospital re-admission for gastrointestinal surgery subjects: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2022Pooled it
- Clinical study of enhanced recovery after surgery in laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Trial
- Outpatient management of acute uncomplicated appendicitis after laparoscopic appendectomy: a randomized controlled trial.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2022Trial
- AI-based disease severity grading predicts complications in laparoscopic appendectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Improving Laparoscopic Appendectomy Outcomes Using an Ileocecal Fold of Treves Buttress Technique.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026Article
- Principles o af safe day case appendicectomy and patient satisfaction rates: a systematic review.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Article
- Oxycodone Combined with Dexmedetomidine versus Oxycodone Alone and Sufentanil for Early Postoperative Analgesia and Perioperative Outcomes After Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Adult Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Appendectomy.Anesthesiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Article
- Postoperative Infections After Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis: The Surgeon's Checklist.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Targeted nutritional intervention with enhanced recovery after surgery for carotid endarterectomy: A prospective clinical trial.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Perioperative pain management based on enhanced recovery after surgery in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy: A prospective, randomized controlled trial.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2022Article
- Relationship Between Appendectomy Incidence and Computed Tomography Scans Based on Korean Nationwide Data, 2003-2017.Journal of Korean medical science · 2022Article
- Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol for acute complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2021Article
- Modified enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients with acute cholecystitis: efficacy, safety and feasibility. Multicenter randomized control study.Updates in surgery · 2021Article
- Comparing the Postoperative Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Three Port Appendectomy With Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Acute Appendicitis: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.Annals of coloproctology · 2021Article
- Nutrition optimization in enhanced recovery after brain tumor surgery: scoping review of evidence, gaps, and a proposed perioperative nutrition score.Neuro-oncology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is a widely used surgical procedure. Patients often suffer from considerable postoperative pain and indigestion, which prolongs their in-hospital stay. Almost 10% of patients develop postoperative complications. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program has proven its efficacy in elective surgery and could hypothetically improve LA outcomes. Currently, there is no ERAS program for LA.
methodsA modified ERAS (mERAS) protocol was studied in a prospective, randomized nonblinded clinical trial. The mERAS group consisted of 50 patients; the control group, of 54 patients. The mERAS protocol included a patient information brochure; minimizing drain use; local anesthesia; low-pressure pneumoperitoneum; early mobilization and oral diet. The primary outcome was postoperative length of stay (pLOS).
resultsModified protocol reduced median pLOS to 1.25 days vs 2 days in the controls (p < 0.0001). Twenty-one (42%) mERAS patients and 4 (7.4%) controls were discharged within 24 h (p < 0.001) after surgery; 0 readmissions were reported. Postoperative pain intensity assessed on the visual analogue scale was significantly lower in the mERAS group [mERAS vs control 0 h, 2 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h after surgery: 2.33 ± 2.12 vs 4.19 ± 2.08 (p < 0.0001), 2.27 ± 1.91 vs 4.02 ± 1.89 (p < 0.0001), 2.28 ± 1.98 vs 3.70 ± 1.57 (p = 0.0001), 1.98 ± 1.72 vs 3.43 ± 1.54 (p < 0.0001) and 1.80 ± 1.74 vs 3.00 ± 1.27 (p = 0.032), respectively)]. The severity of shoulder and neck pain was lower but its incidence was similar. Peristalsis recovery was achieved earlier in the study group (median (min-max))-mERAS 7 (2-34) h vs control 11 (3-43) h; p = 0.009) but did not affect the time of the first flatus 23 (2-72) h vs 29 (6-70) h, respectively; p = 0.499).
conclusionsThe modified ERAS program for LA has advantages over the traditional approach. REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03754777 (27/11/2018).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.