ArticleExperimental animals2020
Blunt olfaction in sexually sluggish male rats.
Article in Experimental animals, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The elusive concept of sexual motivation: can it be anchored in the nervous system?Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Neural and Hormonal Basis of Opposite-Sex Preference by Chemosensory Signals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Among the intact male rats, a subpopulation has been found to show little or no sexual behavior, even after experiencing several mating sessions. This study investigated whether sexually sluggish (SS) males show behavioral differences from normal copulatory (NC) males, other than those concerning sexual behavior. The olfactory preference of males was measured through the time spent displaying nose-poking behavior directed at sexually active males and estrous females for odor exploration in a three-chamber apparatus. Both the NC and SS males showed a significant preference for the odor of estrous females compared with that of male odors. However, SS males spent significantly less time nose-poking estrous females than NC males. The food-finding test was performed after overnight fasting. Our findings showed that all the NC males found the buried pellet within 5 min, whereas over 60% of the SS males failed to find it. The males were also tested for their ability to find a buried bag containing soiled bedding from estrous female cages. The bag was found by 80% of NC males, but only by 20% of SS males. Our results suggest that SS and NC male rats differ not only in sexual behavior but also in other functions such as olfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.