Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32611848›Full record

ReviewEndoscopic ultrasound

EUS-through-the-needle microbiopsy forceps in pancreatic cystic lesions: A systematic review.

Vasile Daniel Balaban, Irina M Cazacu, Larisa Pinte, Mariana Jinga, Manoop S Bhutani, Adrian Saftoiu

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Current Endoscopic and Surgical Management of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A Comprehensive Review.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Advances in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Updates in diagnosis and management of pancreatic cysts.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Vasile Daniel BalabanInternal Medicine and Gastroenterology Clinic, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Craiova; Department of Gastroenterology, "Dr. Carol Davila" Central Military Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Irina M CazacuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Craiova, Romania; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA.
Larisa PinteDepartment of Internal Medicine, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Mariana JingaInternal Medicine and Gastroenterology Clinic, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Craiova; Department of Gastroenterology, "Dr. Carol Davila" Central Military Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Manoop S BhutaniDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA.
Adrian SaftoiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Craiova, Romania.
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova · ROSpitalul Clinic Colentina · ROThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are being increasingly encountered in clinical practice, and sometimes, they can represent a diagnostic challenge. Recently, a through-the-needle micro forceps biopsy (MFB) device was introduced in the endosonography practice to facilitate EUS-guided sampling of PCLs. The aim was to perform a systematic review of studies evaluating the technical aspects, safety, and efficacy of the EUS-guided MFB for PCLs. A literature search was performed in three major databases, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science in September 2019 using the search terms: "through-the-needle," "biopsy forceps," "microforceps," "endoscopic ultrasound," and "endosonography." Case reports and case series with <10 patients were excluded from the analysis. Altogether nine studies reporting on 463 patients were included in our systematic review. The mean age of the patients was 68.3 years, with a slight female predominance (60.9%). Most of the cysts were located in the body/tail of the pancreas (61.2%), with an overall mean size of 33 mm. The technical success of EUS-guided MFB was reported in 98.5%. The tissue acquisition yield reported was 88.2%, and the diagnostic accuracy was 68.6%. Adverse events were reported in 9.7%. EUS-guided MFB is technically feasible, safe, and has a high diagnostic accuracy for PCLs.

Indexed as

diagnostic accuracyEUSmicrobiopsy forcepspancreatic cyst

Identifiers

PMID32611848
PMCPMC7980686
OpenAlexW3039612605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.