Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32611795›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2020

Rapid and Sensitive Direct Detection and Identification of Poliovirus from Stool and Environmental Surveillance Samples by Use of Nanopore Sequencing.

Alexander G Shaw, Manasi Majumdar, Catherine Troman, Áine O'Toole, Blossom Benny, Dilip Abraham, Ira Praharaj, Gagandeep Kang, Salmaan Sharif, Muhammad Masroor Alam and 16 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The challenging concept of eradication: A core concept guiding and frustrating public health.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Alexander G ShawDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom a.shaw@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3166-872X
Manasi MajumdarDivision of Virology, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC), Herts, United Kingdom.
Catherine TromanDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Áine O'TooleInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Ashworth Laboratories, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Blossom BennyDivision of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Dilip AbrahamDivision of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Ira PraharajDivision of Epidemiology & Communicable Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Gagandeep KangDivision of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Salmaan SharifDepartment of Virology, National Institute for Health, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Masroor AlamDepartment of Virology, National Institute for Health, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Shahzad ShaukatDepartment of Virology, National Institute for Health, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Mehar AngezDepartment of Virology, National Institute for Health, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Adnan KhurshidDepartment of Virology, National Institute for Health, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Nayab MahmoodDepartment of Virology, National Institute for Health, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Yasir ArshadDepartment of Virology, National Institute for Health, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Lubna RehmanDepartment of Virology, National Institute for Health, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Ghulam MujtabaDepartment of Virology, National Institute for Health, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Ribqa AktharDepartment of Virology, National Institute for Health, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad SalmanDepartment of Virology, National Institute for Health, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Dimitra KlapsaDivision of Virology, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC), Herts, United Kingdom.
Yara HajarhaDivision of Virology, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC), Herts, United Kingdom.
Humayun AsgharWorld Health Organization Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office, Amman, Jordan.
Ananda BandyopadhyayBill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Andrew RambautInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Ashworth Laboratories, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Javier Martin *Division of Virology, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC), Herts, United Kingdom.
Nicholas Grassly *Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
National Institute of Health · PKNational Institute for Biological Standards and Control · GBChristian Medical College, Vellore · INImperial College London · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBGates Foundation · USIndian Council of Medical Research · IN

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 206298/Z/17/ZWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global poliovirus surveillance involves virus isolation from stool and environmental samples, intratypic differential (ITD) by PCR, and sequencing of the VP1 region to distinguish vaccine (Sabin), vaccine-derived, and wild-type polioviruses and to ensure an appropriate response. This cell culture algorithm takes 2 to 3 weeks on average between sample receipt and sequencing. Direct detection of viral RNA using PCR allows faster detection but has traditionally faced challenges related to poor sensitivity and difficulties in sequencing common samples containing poliovirus and enterovirus mixtures. We present a nested PCR and nanopore sequencing protocol that allows rapid (<3 days) and sensitive direct detection and sequencing of polioviruses in stool and environmental samples. We developed barcoded primers and a real-time analysis platform that generate accurate VP1 consensus sequences from multiplexed samples. The sensitivity and specificity of our protocol compared with those of cell culture were 90.9% (95% confidence interval, 75.7% to 98.1%) and 99.2% (95.5% to 100.0%) for wild-type 1 poliovirus, 92.5% (79.6% to 98.4%) and 98.7% (95.4% to 99.8%) for vaccine and vaccine-derived serotype 2 poliovirus, and 88.3% (81.2% to 93.5%) and 93.2% (88.6% to 96.3%) for Sabin 1 and 3 poliovirus alone or in mixtures when tested on 155 stool samples in Pakistan. Variant analysis of sequencing reads also allowed the identification of polioviruses and enteroviruses in artificial mixtures and was able to distinguish complex mixtures of polioviruses in environmental samples. The median identity of consensus nanopore sequences with Sanger or Illumina sequences from the same samples was >99.9%. This novel method shows promise as a faster and safer alternative to cell culture for the detection and real-time sequencing of polioviruses in stool and environmental samples.

Indexed as

Nanopore SequencingPoliomyelitisPoliovirusEnvironmental MonitoringFecesHumansPoliovirus Vaccine, OralPoliovirus Vaccine, Oralenterovirusenvironmental surveillancenanopore sequencingpoliovirusstool

Identifiers

PMID32611795
PMCPMC7448630
OpenAlexW3038464330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.