Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32611755›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2020

Fiber-1, Not Fiber-2, Directly Mediates the Infection of the Pathogenic Serotype 4 Fowl Adenovirus via Its Shaft and Knob Domains.

Weikang Wang, Qian Liu, Tuofan Li, Tuoyu Geng, Hongjun Chen, Quan Xie, Hongxia Shao, Zhimin Wan, Aijian Qin, Jianqiang Ye

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Biological features of fowl adenovirus serotype-4.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Weikang WangKey Laboratory of Jiangsu Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Key Laboratory for Avian Preventive Medicine, Ministry of Education, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Qian LiuKey Laboratory of Jiangsu Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Key Laboratory for Avian Preventive Medicine, Ministry of Education, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Tuofan LiKey Laboratory of Jiangsu Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Key Laboratory for Avian Preventive Medicine, Ministry of Education, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Tuoyu GengCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Hongjun ChenShanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Quan XieKey Laboratory of Jiangsu Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Key Laboratory for Avian Preventive Medicine, Ministry of Education, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Hongxia ShaoKey Laboratory of Jiangsu Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Key Laboratory for Avian Preventive Medicine, Ministry of Education, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Zhimin WanKey Laboratory of Jiangsu Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Key Laboratory for Avian Preventive Medicine, Ministry of Education, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Aijian QinKey Laboratory of Jiangsu Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Key Laboratory for Avian Preventive Medicine, Ministry of Education, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Jianqiang YeKey Laboratory of Jiangsu Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Key Laboratory for Avian Preventive Medicine, Ministry of Education, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China jqye@yzu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-3940-1357
Yangzhou University · CNShanghai Veterinary Research Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, the disease of hepatitis-hydropericardium syndrome (HPS) caused by serotype 4 fowl adenovirus (FAdV-4) has spread widely and resulted in huge economic losses to the poultry industry. Although the genome of FAdV-4 has two fiber genes (fiber-1 and fiber-2), the exact role of the genes in the infection of FAdV-4 is barely known. In this study, through superinfection resistance analysis and an interfering assay, we found that fiber-1, but not fiber-2, was the key factor for directly triggering the infection of FAdV-4. The truncation analysis further revealed that both of the shaft and knob domains of fiber-1 were required for the infection. Moreover, the sera against the knob domain were able to block FAdV-4 infection, and the knob-containing fusion protein provided efficient protection against the lethal challenge of FAdV-4 in chickens. All the data demonstrated the significant roles of fiber-1 and its knob domain in directly mediating the infection of FAdV-4, which established a foundation for identifying the receptor of FAdV-4 and developing efficient vaccines against FAdV-4.

Indexed as

AdenoviridaeAdenoviridae InfectionsAnimalsAntibodies, ViralCapsid ProteinsCell LineChickensDisease Models, AnimalFemaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CPoultry DiseasesProtein DomainsSerogroupViral VaccinesAntibodies, ViralCapsid Proteinshexon capsid protein, AdenovirusViral VaccinesFAdV-4fiber-1hepatitis-hydropericardium syndromeinfectionknob domainvaccine

Identifiers

PMID32611755
PMCPMC7431794
OpenAlexW3038746996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.