Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32611741›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Prioritising outcomes for evaluating eosinophil-guided corticosteroid therapy among patients with acute COPD exacerbations requiring hospitalisation: a Delphi consensus study.

Carey Meredith Suehs, Maéva Zysman, Cécile Chenivesse, Pierre-Régis Burgel, F Couturaud, Gaëtan Deslee, Patrick Berger, Chantal Raherison, Gilles Devouassoux, Christophe Brousse and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04234360 (Eosinophil-driven Corticotherapy for Patients Hospitalized for COPD Exacerbation), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04234360 phase3terminatednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Eosinophil-driven Corticotherapy for Patients Hospitalized for COPD Exacerbation: a Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, MontpellierRan2021 to 2025Enrolled182ConditionsCOPD ExacerbationArms5 days of systemic corticotherapy (prednisone), 5 days of placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.

Carey Meredith SuehsMaladies Respiratoires, Univ Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France careysuehs@protonmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2175-3496
Maéva ZysmanMaladies Respiratoires, Pôle Cardiothoracique, CHU Haut-Lévèque, Bordeaux, France.
Cécile ChenivessePneumologie et Immuno-Allergologie, CHU Lille, Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019 - UMR 8204 - CIIL - Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, Lille, France.
Pierre-Régis BurgelRespiratory Medicine, Cochin Hospital (APHP), University Paris Descartes (INSERM U1016 Institut Cochin), Université de Paris, Paris, France.
F CouturaudInternal Medicine and Chest Diseases, EA3878, CIC-INSERM1412, Brest University Hospital Centre, Brest University, Brest, France.
Gaëtan DesleePulmonary Medicine, INSERM U1250, University Hospital of Reims, Reims, France.
Patrick BergerCentre de Recherche Cardio-thoracique de Bordeaux, INSERM U1045, Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Chantal RaherisonBordeaux Population Health Research Center, U1219 BPH - Inserm - Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Gilles DevouassouxPneumologie, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon et Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, EA7426, Lyon, France.
Christophe BrousseClinique du Parc, 34170 Castelnau le Lez, France.
Nicolas RocheRespiratory Medicine, Cochin Hospital (APHP), University Paris Descartes (INSERM U1016 Institut Cochin), Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Mathieu MolimardPharmacologie, Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM U1219, Bordeaux, France.
Thierry ChinetPneumologie et Oncologie Thoracique, CHU Ambroise Paré, AP-HP, Université de Versailles SQY, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, France.
Philippe DevillierAirway Diseases, UPRES EA 220, Foch hospital, University Paris-Saclay, Suresnes, France.
Pascal ChanezRespiratory Diseases, AP-HM, INSERM, INRA, C2VN Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Romain KesslerPneumologie, Fédération de médecine translationnelle, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Alain DidierPôle des Voies Respiratoires, Hôpital Larrey, CHU de Toulouse et Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Yan MartinatCM PAROT, Lyon, France.
Olivier Le RouzicPneumologie et Immuno-Allergologie, CHU Lille, Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019 - UMR 8204 - CIIL - Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, Lille, France.
A BourdinMaladies Respiratoires, Univ Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Inserm · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FRbioMérieux (France) · FRClinica de Pneumologie Iaşi · ROCouncil of Independent Colleges · USHôpital Foch · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FRUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FRUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPresently, those outcomes that should be prioritised for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation studies remain unclear. In order to coordinate multicentre studies on eosinophilia-driven corticosteroid therapy for patients hospitalised for acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD), we aimed to find consensus among experts in the domain regarding the prioritisation of outcomes.

designA modified Delphi study was proposed to recognised COPD experts. Two brainstorming questionnaires were used to collect potential outcomes. Four subsequent rounds of questionnaires were used to rank items according to a six-point Likert scale for their importance in the protocol, as well as for being the primary outcome. Priority outcome criteria were predefined as those for which ≥70% of experts indicated that the outcome was essential for interpreting study results.

settingCOPD exacerbation management in France.

participants34 experts recommended by the French Language Pulmonology Society were invited to participate. Of the latter, 21 experts participated in brainstorming, and 19 participated in all four ranking rounds.

results105 outcomes were ranked. Two achieved consensus as candidate primary outcomes: (1) treatment failure defined as death from any cause or the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation, readmission because of COPD or intensification of pharmacologic therapy, and (2) the time required to meet predefined discharge criteria. The 10 secondary priority outcomes included survival, time with no sign of improvement, episodes of hospitalisation, exacerbation, pneumonia, mechanical or non-invasive ventilation and oxygen use, as well as comorbidities during the initial hospitalisation.

conclusionsThis Delphi consensus project generated and prioritised a great many outcomes, documenting current expert views concerning a diversity of COPD endpoints. Among the latter, 12 reached consensus as priority outcomes for evaluating the efficacy of eosinophil-driven corticosteroid therapy in AECOPD inpatients. STUDY REGISTRATION: The

Indexed as

EosinophilsAdrenal Cortex HormonesDelphi TechniqueFranceHospitalizationHumansLeukocyte CountOutcome Assessment, Health CarePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSurveys and QuestionnairesAdrenal Cortex Hormoneschronic airways diseaserespiratory medicine (see thoracic medicine)therapeutics

Identifiers

PMID32611741
PMCPMC7332193
OpenAlexW3039232581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.