Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32611696›Full record

ArticlemSphere2020

Light and Primary Production Shape Bacterial Activity and Community Composition of Aerobic Anoxygenic Phototrophic Bacteria in a Microcosm Experiment.

Kasia Piwosz, Ana Vrdoljak, Thijs Frenken, Juan Manuel González-Olalla, Danijela Šantić, R Michael McKay, Kristian Spilling, Lior Guttman, Petr Znachor, Izabela Mujakić and 7 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A latest review on the application of microcosm model in environmental research.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Prokaryotic Microbiome ofMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Kasia PiwoszCenter Algatech, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Třeboň, Czechia piwosz@alga.cz hgrossart@igb-berlin.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3248-3364
Ana VrdoljakInstitute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Split, Croatia.
Thijs FrenkenDepartment of Aquatic Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8989-2804
Juan Manuel González-OlallaUniversity Institute of Water Research, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Danijela ŠantićInstitute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Split, Croatia.
R Michael McKayGreat Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada.
Kristian SpillingMarine Research Centre, Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland.
Lior GuttmanIsrael Oceanographic and Limnological Research, National Center for Mariculture, Eilat, Israel.
Petr ZnachorInstitute of Hydrobiology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, České Budějovice, Czechia.
Izabela MujakićCenter Algatech, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Třeboň, Czechia.
Lívia Kolesár FecskeováCenter Algatech, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Třeboň, Czechia.
Luca ZoccaratoDepartment Experimental Limnology, Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Stechlin, Germany.
Martina HanusováCenter Algatech, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Třeboň, Czechia.
Andrea PessinaDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences (DiSVA), Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Tom ReichHaifa University, Haifa, Israel.
Hans-Peter GrossartDepartment Experimental Limnology, Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Stechlin, Germany piwosz@alga.cz hgrossart@igb-berlin.de.
Michal KoblížekCenter Algatech, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Třeboň, Czechia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytoplankton is a key component of aquatic microbial communities, and metabolic coupling between phytoplankton and bacteria determines the fate of dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Yet, the impact of primary production on bacterial activity and community composition remains largely unknown, as, for example, in the case of aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic (AAP) bacteria that utilize both phytoplankton-derived DOC and light as energy sources. Here, we studied how reduction of primary production in a natural freshwater community affects the bacterial community composition and its activity, focusing primarily on AAP bacteria. The bacterial respiration rate was the lowest when photosynthesis was reduced by direct inhibition of photosystem II and the highest in ambient light condition with no photosynthesis inhibition, suggesting that it was limited by carbon availability. However, bacterial assimilation rates of leucine and glucose were unaffected, indicating that increased bacterial growth efficiency (e.g., due to photoheterotrophy) can help to maintain overall bacterial production when low primary production limits DOC availability. Bacterial community composition was tightly linked to light intensity, mainly due to the increased relative abundance of light-dependent AAP bacteria. This notion shows that changes in bacterial community composition are not necessarily reflected by changes in bacterial production or growth and vice versa. Moreover, we demonstrated for the first time that light can directly affect bacterial community composition, a topic which has been neglected in studies of phytoplankton-bacteria interactions.

Indexed as

EcosystemMicrobiotaPhototrophic ProcessesBacteria, AerobicBacterial Physiological PhenomenaFresh WaterLightPhotosynthesisSeawaterAAP community compositionaerobic anoxygenic phototrophic bacteriabacterial community compositionphytoplankton-bacteria coupling

Identifiers

PMID32611696
PMCPMC7333569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.