Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32611675›Full record

ReviewHeart (British Cardiac Society)2020

Pregnancy in congenital heart disease: risk prediction and counselling.

Iris M van Hagen, Jolien W Roos-Hesselink

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Pregnancy & cardiovascular disease: the PREG-CVD-HH registry.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2024
    Article
  17. Exploring the Lived Experiences of Young Women With Congenital Heart Disease Through Adolescence: A Qualitative Feminist Study Using Focus Groups.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Iris M van HagenCardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands i.vanhagen@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-5592-1593
Jolien W Roos-HesselinkCardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6770-3830

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

CounselingHeart Defects, CongenitalPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularAdultFemaleHumansPatient Care ManagementPregnancyPregnancy, High-RiskRisk AssessmentRisk Factorscongenital heart diseasemedical educationpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID32611675
PMCPMC7677481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.