Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32611583›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2020

A Prospective Analysis of Intake of Red and Processed Meat in Relation to Pancreatic Cancer among African American Women.

Jessica L Petrick, Nelsy Castro-Webb, Hanna Gerlovin, Traci N Bethea, Shanshan Li, Edward A Ruiz-Narváez, Lynn Rosenberg, Julie R Palmer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer: New version, new vision.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica L PetrickSlone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts. jpetrick@bu.edu.
Nelsy Castro-WebbSlone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Hanna GerlovinSlone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-6700-2129
Traci N BetheaSchool of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.ORCID 0000-0003-3205-2078
Shanshan LiSlone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-6268-125X
Edward A Ruiz-NarváezDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-0339-5824
Lynn RosenbergSlone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Julie R PalmerSlone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Boston University · USGeorgetown University · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

A Follow-up Study for Causes of Cancer in Black WomenU01CA164974 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI Kimberly A. Bertrand, Yvette C Cozier · 2017 to 2026
$24.0M
FOLLOW-UP STUDY FOR CAUSES OF ILLNESS IN BLACK WOMENR01CA058420 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI ROSENBERG, LYNN · 1999 to 2013
$20.7M
A Prospective Investigation of the Oral Microbiome and Pancreatic CancerU01CA187508 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI PALMER, JULIE R, SHU, XIAO-OU · 2015 to 2018
$2.1M
An assessment of whether aspirin and/or vitamin D improves breast cancer outcomes in Black women and the modifying effect of genetic variantsK01CA212056 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI BETHEA, TRACI N. · 2017 to 2021
$656k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA212056NCI NIH HHS R01 CA058420NCI NIH HHS U01 CA164974NCI NIH HHS U01 CA187508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfrican Americans have the highest incidence of pancreatic cancer of any racial/ethnic group in the United States. There is evidence that consumption of red or processed meat and foods containing saturated fats may increase the risk of pancreatic cancer, but there is limited evidence in African Americans.

methodsUtilizing the Black Women's Health Study (1995-2018), we prospectively investigated the associations of red and processed meat and saturated fats with incidence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (

resultsBased on 148 cases among women aged ≥50 years, total red meat intake was associated with a 65% increased pancreatic cancer risk (HR

conclusionsRed meat-specifically, unprocessed red meat-and saturated fat intakes were associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer in African-American women aged 50 and older, but not among younger women. IMPACT: The accumulating evidence-including now in African-American women-suggests that diet, a modifiable factor, plays a role in the etiology of pancreatic cancer, suggesting opportunities for prevention.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlack or African AmericanFemaleHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsProspective StudiesRed MeatYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32611583
PMCPMC7484450
OpenAlexW3038886485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.