Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32611472›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2020

Validation of a new software eAT24 used to assess dietary intake in the adult Portuguese population.

Ana Cl Goios, Milton Severo, Amanda J Lloyd, Vânia Pl Magalhães, Carla Lopes, Duarte Pm Torres

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana Cl GoiosFaculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Porto, 4200-465Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2212-0786
Milton SeveroEpidemiology Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5787-4871
Amanda J LloydInstitute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, UK.
Vânia Pl MagalhãesEpidemiology Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6521-980X
Carla LopesEpidemiology Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1524-852X
Duarte Pm TorresFaculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Porto, 4200-465Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8960-2160

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the current study was to evaluate the accuracy of the new software eAT24 used to assess dietary intake in the National Food, Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (IAN-AF) against urinary biomarkers: N (nitrogen), K (potassium) and Na (sodium).

designWe conducted a cross-sectional study. Two non-consecutive 24-h dietary recalls (24-HDR) were applied, and a 24-h urine sample was collected. We examined differences between estimates from dietary and urine measures, Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated and the Bland-Altman plots were drawn. Multiple linear regression was used to evaluate the factors associated with the difference between estimates.

settingSub-sample from the Portuguese IAN-AF sampling frame.

participantsNinety-five adults (men and women) aged 18-84 years.

resultsThe estimated intake calculated using the dietary recall data was lower than that estimated from urinary excretion for the three biomarkers studied (protein 94·3 v. 100·4 g/d, K 3212 v. 3416 mg/d and Na 3489 v. 4003 mg/d). Considering 2 d of recall, the deattenuated correlation coefficients were 0·33, 0·64 and 0·26 for protein, K and Na, respectively. For protein, differences between dietary and urinary estimates varied according to BMI (β = -1·96, P = 0·017). The energy intake and 24-h urine volume were significantly associated with the difference between estimates for protein (β = 0·03, P < 0·001 and β = -0·02, P = 0·002, respectively), K (β = 0·71, P < 0·001 and β = -0·42, P = 0·040, respectively) and Na (β = 1·55, P < 0·001 and β = -0·81, P = 0·011, respectively).

conclusionsThe new software eAT24 performed well in estimating protein and K intakes, but lesser so in estimating Na intake, using two non-consecutive 24-HDR.

Indexed as

DietAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEatingFemaleHumansMalePortugalSodium, DietarySoftwareSodium, Dietary24-h dietary recallNitrogenPortuguese dietary surveyPotassiumSodiumUrinary biomarkersValidation

Identifiers

PMID32611472
PMCPMC10200576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.