ArticleTrials2020
Esophagectomy versus definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with clinical stage N0 and pathological stage T1b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after endoscopic submucosal dissection: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial (Ad-ESD Trial).
Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04135664 (Adjuvant Esophagectomy Versus Chemoradiation for Patients With Clinical Stage N0 and Pathological Stage T1b), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Adjuvant Esophagectomy Versus Chemoradiation for Patients With Clinical Stage N0 and Pathological Stage T1b (After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection, ESD) Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (Ad-ESD Trial): a Multicentric, Open Label, Randomized Trial
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term outcomes of additional surgical versus nonsurgical treatment after non-curative endoscopic resection for T1 superficial esophageal cancer.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Innovations in Advanced Endoscopic Resection of Early Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Next step after endoscopic resection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: metastatic risk assessment and management of non-curative resection cases.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Current status and perspectives of esophageal cancer: a comprehensive review.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2025Review
- Additional chemoradiotherapy following endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Treatment strategy for early-stage esophageal cancer.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024Review
- [Strategies for the Endoscopic Management and Post-Resection Treatment of Superficial Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma].The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2024Review
- Long-term survival in esophagectomy for early-stage esophageal cancer versus endoscopic resection plus additional chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Clinical characteristics and survival of esophageal cancer patients: annual report of the surgical treatment in Shanghai Chest Hospital, 2016.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Article
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEsophagectomy is still advised as an additional treatment for pathological T1b (pT1b) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) following attempted endoscopic resection (ER). ER followed with definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) has shown increased quality of life as well as comparable oncological outcomes to esophagectomy. However, there is no well-designed phase III trial to compare the two treatments for patients with pT1b ESCC.
methodsOne hundred seventy-six patients with clinical stage N0 (cN0) and pT1b ESCC will be recruited at three centers and randomly assigned to the esophagectomy group or the dCRT group. The clinical lymph node status will be measured by image examination, including computer tomography and positron emission tomography-computed tomography. The pathological tumor status will be diagnosed after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). All patients will be followed up for 60 months after randomization. The primary endpoint is 5-year overall survival. The secondary endpoints are quality of life, related adverse events, 3-year overall survival, and relapse-free survival rates. DISCUSSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first phase III randomized controlled trial to compare esophagectomy and dCRT for patients with cN0-pT1b ESCC after ESD. Based on the results of this study, we will show whether dCRT will benefit patients more than esophagectomy, which will contribute more high-quality evidence to the primary salvage treatment for these patients.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04135664 . Registered on Aug. 10, 2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.