Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32611393›Full record

Observational studyBMC neurology2020

Different predictors after stroke depending on functional dependency at discharge: a 5-year follow up study.

Emma Westerlind, Daniel Hörsell, Hanna C Persson

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emma WesterlindInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Per Dubbsgatan 14, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Daniel HörsellInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Per Dubbsgatan 14, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Hanna C PerssonInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Per Dubbsgatan 14, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden. hanna.persson@neuro.gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8633-3292
Sahlgrenska University Hospital · SE

Funding

ALF agreement ALFGBG-718711Vetenskapsrådet VR2017-00946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLevel of dependency after a stroke is important for long-term outcome in several aspects, but less is known about important predictors for outcome depending on functional dependency. The aim of the current study was to investigate self-perceived outcome and identify possible predictors of strength, participation, and emotional outcome 5 years after stroke based on functional dependency at discharge from hospital.

methodsThis observational cohort study included participants living in Gothenburg that were diagnosed with first ever stroke in 2009 and 2010. Baseline data were gathered from medical charts and the outcome was based on the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) questionnaire mailed out 5 years post-stroke. Logistic regression identified potential predictors of better strength, participation, and emotional outcome.

resultsA total of 266 participants responded to the SIS. The functionally independent participants at hospital discharge reported significantly better scores in all SIS domains compared to the functionally dependent. For those who were functionally independent, only non-modifiable factors (age, sex, stroke type) were significant predictors of a better outcome. However, for the functionally dependent participants, modifiable factors such as feeling depressed, cardiovascular risk factors, and recurrent stroke were significant predictors of unfavourable outcome.

conclusionsImportant factors for predicting a favourable outcome differed due to the level of functional dependency, and modifiable factors were only present in participants that were functionally dependent at discharge. Prevention, detection, and treatment of modifiable factors give an opportunity to reduce the burden of stroke for those who are most vulnerable.

Indexed as

Self ConceptStroke RehabilitationAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesEmotionsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargeStrokeSurveys and QuestionnairesFollow-up studiesRehabilitationStrokeStroke impact scale

Identifiers

PMID32611393
PMCPMC7329496
OpenAlexW3038393105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.