ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020
Chromatin 3D structure reconstruction with consideration of adjacency relationship among genomic loci.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Jpx RNA controls Xist induction through spatial reorganization of the mouse X-inactivation center.Developmental cell · 2025Article
- ChromInSight: Revealing DNA Double-Strand Breaks Through Chromatin Structural Insights With an Interpretable Graph Neural Network Framework.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Reconstructing 3D chromosome structures from single-cell Hi-C data with SO(3)-equivariant graph neural networks.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- geomeTriD: a Bioconductor package for interactive and integrative visualization of 3D structural model with multi-omics data.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Advancements and future directions in single-cell Hi-C based 3D chromatin modeling.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Chromosome structure modeling tools and their evaluation in bacteria.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- EVRC: reconstruction of chromosome 3D structure models using error-vector resultant algorithm with clustering coefficient.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Techniques for and challenges in reconstructing 3D genome structures from 2D chromosome conformation capture data.Current opinion in cell biology · 2023Review
- HiC-GNN: A generalizable model for 3D chromosome reconstruction using graph convolutional neural networks.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Inference of 3D genome architecture by modeling overdispersion of Hi-C data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- ParticleChromo3D: a Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm for chromosome 3D structure prediction from Hi-C data.BioData mining · 2022Article
- Article
- Application of Hi-C and other omics data analysis in human cancer and cell differentiation research.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChromatin 3D conformation plays important roles in regulating gene or protein functions. High-throughout chromosome conformation capture (3C)-based technologies, such as Hi-C, have been exploited to acquire the contact frequencies among genomic loci at genome-scale. Various computational tools have been proposed to recover the underlying chromatin 3D structures from in situ Hi-C contact map data. As connected residuals in a polymer, neighboring genomic loci have intrinsic mutual dependencies in building a 3D conformation. However, current methods seldom take this feature into account.
resultsWe present a method called ShNeigh, which combines the classical MDS technique with local dependence of neighboring loci modeled by a Gaussian formula, to infer the best 3D structure from noisy and incomplete contact frequency matrices. We validated ShNeigh by comparing it to two typical distance-based algorithms, ShRec3D and ChromSDE. The comparison results on simulated Hi-C dataset showed that, while keeping the high-speed nature of classical MDS, ShNeigh can recover the true structure better than ShRec3D and ChromSDE. Meanwhile, ShNeigh is more robust to data noise. On the publicly available human GM06990 Hi-C data, we demonstrated that the structures reconstructed by ShNeigh are more reproducible between different restriction enzymes than by ShRec3D and ChromSDE, especially at high resolutions manifested by sparse contact maps, which means ShNeigh is more robust to signal coverage.
conclusionsOur method can recover stable structures in high noise and sparse signal settings. It can also reconstruct similar structures from Hi-C data obtained using different restriction enzymes. Therefore, our method provides a new direction for enhancing the reconstruction quality of chromatin 3D structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.