Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32611375›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2020

Identifying Chagas disease vectors using elliptic Fourier descriptors of body contour: a case for the cryptic dimidiata complex.

Daryl D Cruz, Elizabeth Arellano, Dennis Denis Ávila, Carlos N Ibarra-Cerdeña

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Body of Chagas Disease Vectors.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Identifying disease vector images in the Americas in the age of artificial intelligence.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Geometric morphometrics and ecological niche modelling for delimitation ofCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daryl D CruzCentro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Conservación (CIByC), UAEM, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México. daryldavidcf@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7714-2459
Elizabeth ArellanoCentro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Conservación (CIByC), UAEM, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8709-9514
Dennis Denis ÁvilaDepartamento de Biología Animal y Humana, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de La Habana, Havana, Cuba.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4808-7195
Carlos N Ibarra-CerdeñaDepartamento de Ecología Humana, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN (CINVESTAV), Unidad Mérida, Yucatán, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4980-4344

Funding

CONACyT 2018-000012-01NACF-11846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTriatoma dimidiata (Reduviidae: Triatominae) is an important vector of Chagas disease in various countries in the Americas. Phylogenetic studies have defined three lineages in Mexico and part of Central America. While there is a marked genetic differentiation, methods for identifying them using morphometric analyses with landmarks have not yet been fully resolutive. Elliptical Fourier descriptors (EFDs), which mathematically describe the shape of any closed two-dimensional contours, could be a potentially useful alternative method. Our objective was to validate the use of EFDs for the identification of three lineages of this species complex.

methodA total of 84 dorsal view images of individuals of the three lineages were used. Body contours were described with EFDs using between 5 and 30 harmonics. The number of obtained coefficients was reduced by a principal components analysis and the first axis scores were used as shape variables. A linear discriminant function analysis and an ordination plot of the discriminant analysis were performed using the shape variables. A confusion matrix of the ordination plot of the discriminant analysis was obtained to estimate the classification errors, the first five PC scores were statistically compared, and a neural network were then performed using the shape variables.

resultsThe first principal component explained 50% of the variability, regardless the number of harmonics used. The results of discriminant analysis get improved by increasing the number of harmonics and components considered. With 25 harmonics and 30 components, the identification of haplogroups was achieved with an overall efficiency greater than 97%. The ordering diagram showed the correct discrimination of haplogroups, with only one error of discrimination corroborated by the confusion matrix. When comparing the first five PC scores, significant differences were found among at least two haplogroups. The 30 multilayer perceptron neural networks were also efficient in identification, reaching 91% efficiency with the validation data.

conclusionsThe use of EFD is a simple and useful method for the identification of the main lineages of Triatoma dimidiata, with high values of correct identification.

Indexed as

TriatomaAnimalsChagas DiseaseClassificationDisease VectorsInsect VectorsMexicoContoursFourierIdentificationMorphometric analysisTriatomine

Identifiers

PMID32611375
PMCPMC7329423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.