Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32611351›Full record

ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2020

Predictors of instanteous relief from spinal manipulation for non-specific low back pain: a delphi study.

Stanley Innes, Amber Beynon, Christopher Hodgetts, Rachel Manassah, Denyse Lim, Bruce F Walker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stanley InnesPsychology, Exercise Science, Counselling and Chiropractic, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia. S.Innes@murdoch.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-7783-8328
Amber BeynonPsychology, Exercise Science, Counselling and Chiropractic, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.
Christopher HodgettsPsychology, Exercise Science, Counselling and Chiropractic, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.
Rachel Manassah5th Year student, Psychology, Exercise Science, Counselling and Chiropractic, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.
Denyse Lim5th Year student, Psychology, Exercise Science, Counselling and Chiropractic, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.
Bruce F WalkerPsychology, Exercise Science, Counselling and Chiropractic, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.
Murdoch University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is some evidence and anecdotal reports that high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) for non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) may immediately reduce pain in some patients. The mechanism for such a change remains unclear and the evidence is conflicting. The aim of this study was to seek consensus among a sample of expert manual therapists as to the possible clinical predictors that could help identify patients who are most likely to receive instant relief from NSLBP with SMT intervention.

methodsThirty-seven expert chiropractors and manipulative physiotherapists from around the world were invited to participate in a three round online Delphi questionnaire during the second half of 2018. Participants were provided with a list of 55 potential signs and symptoms as well as offering them the option of suggesting other factors in the first round. The variables were rated using a 4-point Likert likelihood scale and a threshold of 75% agreement was required for any item to progress to the next round.

resultsOf these 37 experts, 19 agreed to participate. Agreement as to the proportion of patients who receive instantaneous relief was minimal (range 10-80%). A total of 62 items were ranked over the 3 rounds, with 18 of these retained following the third round. The highest rated of the 18 was 'A history including a good response to previous spinal manipulation'. DISCUSSION/

conclusionFive categories; patient factors, practitioner factors, signs and symptoms of NSLBP presentation, an instrument of measurement (FABQ), and the presence of cavitation following SMT best describe the overall characteristics of the factors. The 18 factors identified in this study can potentially be used to create an instrument of measurement for further study to predict those patients with NSLBP who will receive instantaneous relief post-SMT.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniqueHumansLow Back PainManipulation, SpinalPain MeasurementDelphiInstantaneous responseSpinal manipulation

Identifiers

PMID32611351
PMCPMC7331174
OpenAlexW3039301080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.