Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32611320›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2020

Treatment of urinary tract infections in Swiss primary care: quality and determinants of antibiotic prescribing.

Andreas Plate, Andreas Kronenberg, Martin Risch, Yolanda Mueller, Stefania Di Gangi, Thomas Rosemann, Oliver Senn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andreas PlateInstitute of Primary Care, University and University Hospital of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, 8071, Zurich, Switzerland. andreas.plate@usz.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-6143-5479
Andreas KronenbergSwiss Center for Antibiotic Resistance, Institute for Infectious Diseases, University Bern, Bern and Medix General Practice Network, Bern, Switzerland.
Martin Rischlabormedizinisches zentrum Dr Risch Ostschweiz AG, Buchs, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Yolanda MuellerDepartment of Family Medicine, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Stefania Di GangiInstitute of Primary Care, University and University Hospital of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, 8071, Zurich, Switzerland.
Thomas RosemannInstitute of Primary Care, University and University Hospital of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, 8071, Zurich, Switzerland.
Oliver SennInstitute of Primary Care, University and University Hospital of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, 8071, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrinary tract infections are one of the most common reasons for prescribing antibiotics in primary care. Current guidelines recommend fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin, or trimethoprim - sulfamethoxazol as empiric first line antimicrobial agents in uncomplicated infections. However, there is evidence that the use of fluoroquinolones, which are no longer recommended, is still inappropriate high. We determined antibiotic prescription patterns, quality and factors affecting antibiotic prescriptions in urinary tract infections in primary care in Switzerland.

methodsFrom June 2017 to August 2018, we conducted a cross-sectional study in patients suffering from a urinary tract infection (UTI). Patient and general practitioners characteristics as well as antibiotic prescribing patterns were analysed.

resultsAntibiotic prescribing patterns in 1.352 consecutively recruited patients, treated in 163 practices could be analysed. In 950 (84.7%) patients with an uncomplicated UTI the prescriptions were according to current guidelines and therefore rated as appropriate. Fluoroquinolones were prescribed in 13.8% and therefore rated as inappropriate. In multivariable analysis, the age of the general practitioner was associated with increasing odds of prescribing a not guideline recommended antibiotic therapy.

conclusionsWe found a high degree of guideline conform antibiotic prescriptions in patients with an uncomplicated urinary tract infection in primary care in Switzerland. However, there is still a substantial use of fluoroquinolones in empiric therapy.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsInappropriate PrescribingPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareUrinary Tract InfectionsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicQuality Indicators, Health CareSwitzerlandAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic prescribing qualityPrimary careQuality indicatorSwitzerlandUrinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID32611320
PMCPMC7329427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.