Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32610786›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2021

Separated at Birth: The Politics of Pharmacare for All in Canada and Medicare for All in the United States Comment on "Universal Pharmacare in Canada".

Carolyn Hughes Tuohy

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Carolyn Hughes TuohyMunk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8781-6253

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Policy decisions about healthcare coverage in Canada and the United States in the 1960s placed two virtually identical systems on different evolutionary paths in the physician and hospital sectors. However, prescription drug coverage remained outside Canada's single-payer model, and employer-based coverage continued to be the norm for the workforce population, as is the case across the broad healthcare system in the United States. As a result the current debate about pharmacare in Canada mirrors in political microcosm the larger debate on universal health insurance among American Democrats. In each case the near-term prospects for a single-payer plan appear slim.

Indexed as

MedicareUniversal Health InsuranceCanadaHumansInfant, NewbornNational Health ProgramsPoliticsUnited StatesCanadaHealthcare PoliticsMedicare for AllUnited StatesUniversal Pharmacare

Identifiers

PMID32610786
PMCPMC7947896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.