Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32610772›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2021

It's Not the Model, It's the Way You Use It: Exploratory Early Health Economics Amid Complexity Comment on "Problems and Promises of Health Technologies: The Role of Early Health Economic Modelling".

Andrew Partington, Jonathan Karnon

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew PartingtonFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2580-3355
Jonathan KarnonFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3220-2099

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a review recently published in this journal, Grutters et al outline the scope and impact of their early health economic modelling of healthcare innovations. Their reflections shed light on ways that health economists can shift-away from traditional reimbursement decision-support, towards a broader role of facilitating the exploration of existing care pathways, and the design of options to implement or discontinue healthcare services. This is a crucial role in organisations that face constant pressure to react and adapt with changes to their existing service configurations, but where there may exist significant disagreement and uncertainty on the extent to which change is warranted. Such dynamics are known to create complex implementation environments, where changes risk being poorly implemented or fail to be sustained. In this commentary, we extend the discussion by Grutters et al on early health economic modelling, to the evaluation of complex interventions and systems. We highlight how early health economic modelling can contribute to a participatory approach for ongoing learning and development within healthcare organisations.

Indexed as

Biomedical TechnologyModels, EconomicDelivery of Health CareHumansUncertaintyComplexityDecision-MakingEarly AssessmentEconomic EvaluationHealth Systems

Identifiers

PMID32610772
PMCPMC7947702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.