ArticleMicromachines2020
A Preliminary Prototype High-Speed Feedback Control of an Artificial Cochlear Sensory Epithelium Mimicking Function of Outer Hair Cells.
Article in Micromachines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A novel feedback control technique for the local oscillation amplitude in an artificial cochlear sensory epithelium that mimics the functions of the outer hair cells in the cochlea is successfully developed and can be implemented with a control time on the order of hundreds of milliseconds. The prototype artificial cochlear sensory epithelium was improved from that developed in our previous study to enable the instantaneous determination of the local resonance position based on the electrical output from a bimorph piezoelectric membrane. The device contains local patterned electrodes deposited with micro electro mechanical system (MEMS) technology that is used to detect the electrical output and oscillate the device by applying local electrical stimuli. The main feature of the present feedback control system is the principle that the resonance position is recognized by simultaneously measuring the local electrical outputs of all of the electrodes and comparing their magnitudes, which drastically reduces the feedback control time. In this way, it takes 0.8 s to control the local oscillation of the device, representing the speed of control with the order of one hundred times relative to that in the previous study using the mechanical automatic stage to scan the oscillation amplitude at each electrode. Furthermore, the intrinsic difficulties in the experiment such as the electrical measurement against the electromagnetic noise, adhesion of materials, and fatigue failure mechanism of the oscillation system are also shown and discussed in detail based on the many scientific aspects. The basic knowledge of the MEMS fabrication and the experimental measurement would provide useful suggestions for future research. The proposed preliminary prototype high-speed feedback control can aid in the future development of fully implantable cochlear implants with a wider dynamic range.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.