Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32610672›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Effects of Bag Mask Ventilation and Advanced Airway Management on Adherence to Ventilation Recommendations and Chest Compression Fraction: A Prospective Randomized Simulator-Based Trial.

Lea Vogt, Timur Sellmann, Dietmar Wetzchewald, Heidrun Schwager, Sebastian Russo, Stephan Marsch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Manual and Mechanical Induced Peri-Resuscitation Injuries-Post-Mortem and Clinical Findings.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lea VogtDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Bethesda Hospital, 47053 Duisburg, Germany.
Timur SellmannDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Bethesda Hospital, 47053 Duisburg, Germany.
Dietmar WetzchewaldInstitution for Emergency Medicine, 59755 Arnsberg, Germany.
Heidrun SchwagerInstitution for Emergency Medicine, 59755 Arnsberg, Germany.
Sebastian RussoDepartment of Anaesthesiology 1, Witten/Herdecke University, 58455 Witten, Germany.
Stephan MarschDepartment of Intensive Care, University Hospital, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4095-2765
Klinikum Arnsberg · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DEEvangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda · DEUniversity Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of advanced airway management (AAM) in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is currently debated as observational studies reported better outcomes after bag-mask ventilation (BMV), and the only prospective randomized trial was inconclusive. Adherence to CPR guidelines ventilation recommendations is unknown and difficult to assess in clinical trials. This study compared AAM and BMV with regard to adherence to ventilation recommendations and chest compression fractions in simulated cardiac arrests. A total of 154 teams of 3-4 physicians were randomized to perform CPR with resuscitation equipment restricting airway management to BMV only or equipment allowing for all forms of AAM. BMV teams ventilated 6 ± 6/min and AAM teams 19 ± 8/min (range 3-42/min;

Indexed as

advanced airway managementbag-mask ventilationcardiopulmonary resuscitationrandomized controlled trialsimulation

Identifiers

PMID32610672
PMCPMC7408746
OpenAlexW3040456615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.