Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32610487›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

A Three-Arm Randomised Controlled Trial of High- and Low-Intensity Implementation Strategies to Support Centre-Based Childcare Service Implementation of Nutrition Guidelines: 12-Month Follow-Up.

Alice Grady, Kirsty Seward, Meghan Finch, Luke Wolfenden, Rebecca Wyse, John Wiggers, Christophe Lecathelinais, Sze Lin Yoong

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Characterisation of At-Scale Community Health Interventions Aimed to Improve Healthy Eating Behaviour in Australia: A Rapid Review.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alice GradySchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan 2308, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3379-5340
Kirsty SewardSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan 2308, Australia.
Meghan FinchSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan 2308, Australia.
Luke WolfendenSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan 2308, Australia.
Rebecca WyseSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan 2308, Australia.
John WiggersSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan 2308, Australia.
Christophe LecathelinaisHunter New England Local Health District, Population Health, Wallsend 2287, Australia.
Sze Lin YoongSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan 2308, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a suite of implementation strategies of varying intensities on centre-based childcare service implementation of nutrition guideline recommendations at 12-month follow-up. A six-month three-arm parallel group randomised controlled trial was undertaken with 69 services, randomised to one of three arms: high-intensity strategies (executive support; group face-to-face training; provision of resources; multiple rounds of audit and feedback; ongoing face-to-face and phone support); low-intensity strategies (group face-to-face training; provision of resources; single round of audit and feedback); or usual care control. Across all study arms, only three high-intensity services were compliant with overall nutrition guidelines. A significant group interaction was found between the three arms for compliance with individual food groups. Relative to control, a significantly greater proportion of low-intensity services were compliant with dairy, and a significantly greater proportion of high-intensity services were compliant with fruit, vegetables, dairy, breads and cereals, and discretionary foods. No significant differences between the high- and low-intensity for individual food group compliance were found. High-intensity implementation strategies may be effective in supporting childcare service implementation of individual food group recommendations. Further research is warranted to identify strategies effective in increasing overall nutrition compliance.

Indexed as

Food ServicesNutrition PolicyAdultChildChild Day Care CentersDietFollow-Up StudiesHealth PromotionHumanschildcarechildrendietguidelinesimplementationmenunutrition

Identifiers

PMID32610487
PMCPMC7370154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.