Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32610478›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

POM/EVA Blends with Future Utility in Fused Deposition Modeling.

Mateusz Galeja, Klaudiusz Wypiór, Jan Wachowicz, Przemysław Kędzierski, Aleksander Hejna, Mariusz Marć, Krzysztof Klewicz, Jadwiga Gabor, Hubert Okła, Andrzej Szymon Swinarew

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mateusz GalejaDepartment of Material Engineering, Central Mining Institute, Pl. Gwarków 1, 40-166 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4207-7677
Klaudiusz WypiórDepartment of Material Engineering, Central Mining Institute, Pl. Gwarków 1, 40-166 Katowice, Poland.
Jan WachowiczDepartment of Material Engineering, Central Mining Institute, Pl. Gwarków 1, 40-166 Katowice, Poland.
Przemysław KędzierskiDepartment of Acoustics, Electronics and IT Solutions, Central Mining Institute, Pl. Gwarków 1, 40-166 Katowice, Poland.
Aleksander HejnaDepartment of Polymer Technology, Gdańsk University of Technology, Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9125-6164
Mariusz MarćDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland.
Krzysztof KlewiczDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland.
Jadwiga GaborFaculty of Science and Technology, University of Silesia in Katowice, 41-500 Chorzów, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4850-1608
Hubert OkłaFaculty of Science and Technology, University of Silesia in Katowice, 41-500 Chorzów, Poland.
Andrzej Szymon SwinarewFaculty of Science and Technology, University of Silesia in Katowice, 41-500 Chorzów, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6116-9510
Central Mining Institute · PLGdańsk University of Technology · PLUniversity of Silesia in Katowice · PLAkademii Wychowania Fizycznego im. Jerzego Kukuczki w Katowicach · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyoxymethylene (POM) is one of the most popular thermoplastic polymers used in the industry. Therefore, the interest in its potential applications in rapid prototyping is understandable. Nevertheless, its low dimensional stability causes the warping of 3D prints, limiting its applications. This research aimed to evaluate the effects of POM modification with ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) (2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 wt.%) on its processing (by melt flow index), structure (by X-ray microcomputed tomography), and properties (by static tensile tests, surface resistance, contact angle measurements, differential scanning calorimetry, and thermogravimetric analysis), as well as very rarely analyzed emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (by headspace analysis). Performed modifications decreased stiffness and strength of the material, simultaneously enhancing its ductility, which simultaneously increased the toughness even by more than 50% for 7.5 wt.% EVA loading. Such an effect was related to an improved linear flow rate resulting in a lack of defects inside the samples. The decrease of the melting temperature and the slight increase of thermal stability after the addition of EVA broadened the processing window for 3D printing. The 3D printing trials on two different printers showed that the addition of EVA copolymer increased the possibility of a successful print without defects, giving space for further development.

Indexed as

3D printingethylene-vinyl acetatepolymer blendspolyoxymethylenevolatile organic compoundswarping

Identifiers

PMID32610478
PMCPMC7372422
OpenAlexW3037439615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.