Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32610072›Full record

ArticleNanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine2020

A nanovaccine formulation of Chlamydia recombinant MOMP encapsulated in PLGA 85:15 nanoparticles augments CD4

Rajnish Sahu, Saurabh Dixit, Richa Verma, Skyla A Duncan, Mamie T Coats, Guillermo H Giambartolomei, Shree R Singh, Vida A Dennis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Structural Assessment ofVaccines · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Expert review of vaccines · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rajnish SahuCenter for NanoBiotechnology & Life Sciences Research, Department of Biological Sciences, Alabama State University, Montgomery, AL, USA.
Saurabh DixitCenter for NanoBiotechnology & Life Sciences Research, Department of Biological Sciences, Alabama State University, Montgomery, AL, USA.
Richa VermaCenter for NanoBiotechnology & Life Sciences Research, Department of Biological Sciences, Alabama State University, Montgomery, AL, USA.
Skyla A DuncanCenter for NanoBiotechnology & Life Sciences Research, Department of Biological Sciences, Alabama State University, Montgomery, AL, USA.
Mamie T CoatsCenter for NanoBiotechnology & Life Sciences Research, Department of Biological Sciences, Alabama State University, Montgomery, AL, USA.
Guillermo H GiambartolomeiInstituto de Inmunología, Genética y Metabolismo (INIGEM), CONICET, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Shree R SinghCenter for NanoBiotechnology & Life Sciences Research, Department of Biological Sciences, Alabama State University, Montgomery, AL, USA.
Vida A DennisCenter for NanoBiotechnology & Life Sciences Research, Department of Biological Sciences, Alabama State University, Montgomery, AL, USA. Electronic address: vdennis@alasu.edu.
Alabama State University · USUniversity of Buenos Aires · AR

Funding

Virology CoreP30AI027767 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Latesha Ellen Elopre · 1988 to 2026
$84.1M
RISE Option II:NIGMS-Research Initiative for Scientific Enhancement (RISE) Program at ASUR25GM106995 · NIGMS · ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DENNIS, VIDA A · 2013 to 2023
$3.0M
Mechanisms and protective efficacy of nanovaccines against Chlamydia trachomatisR21AI111159 · NIAID · ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DENNIS, VIDA A · 2014 to 2015
$341k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027767NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI111159NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM106995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine developmental strategies are utilizing antigens encapsulated in biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles. Here, we developed a Chlamydia nanovaccine (PLGA-rMOMP) by encapsulating its recombinant major outer membrane protein (rMOMP) in the extended-releasing and self-adjuvanting PLGA [poly (D, L-lactide-co-glycolide) (85:15)] nanoparticles. PLGA-rMOMP was small (nanometer size), round and smooth, thermally stable, and exhibited a sustained release of rMOMP. Stimulation of mouse primary dendritic cells (DCs) with PLGA-rMOMP augmented endosome processing, induced Th1 cytokines (IL-6 and IL-12p40), and expression of MHC-II and co-stimulatory (CD40, CD80, and CD86) molecules. BALB/c mice immunized with PLGA-rMOMP produced enhanced CD4

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityAnimalsBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsCD4 AntigensChlamydiaDendritic CellsHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsInterleukin-12 Subunit p40Interleukin-6L-SelectinMiceNanoparticlesPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerT-LymphocytesBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsCD4 AntigensHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHyaluronan ReceptorsInterleukin-12 Subunit p40Interleukin-6L-SelectinOMPA outer membrane proteinsPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerVaccinesBiodistributionChlamydiaDendritic cells traffickingPLGA [poly (D, L-lactide-co-glycolide)] nanoparticlesT-cells and antibody responses

Identifiers

PMID32610072
PMCPMC10198673
OpenAlexW3037474026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.