ArticleJournal of ultrasonography2020
Cervical stenosis and pregnancy rate after ultrasound guided cervical dilation in women undergoing saline infusion sonography.
Article in Journal of ultrasonography, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- First documented case of cervical stenosis resulting in pyometra and fallopian tube torsion.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Addressing Cervical Stenosis and Uterine Fibroids in IVF: A Case Study on the Effectiveness of TMET.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Uterine cervical stenosis: from classification to advances in management. Overcoming the obstacles to access the uterine cavity.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Review
- Primer on Female Infertility for the Reproductive Urologist.Urology research & practice · 2023Article
- Safety and effectiveness of office hysteroscopic metroplasty with and without uterine stent placement in infertile population: a 10-year retrospective study.Therapeutic advances in reproductive healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.