Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32609969›Full record

ArticleJournal of ultrasonography2020

Comparison of the resistive indices obtained in the uterine artery and the ophthalmic artery in preeclamptic and normotensive patients in Doppler US.

Syeda Rabi Madina, Raham Bacha, Syed Amir Gilani, Wafa Fatima, Wahida Awais, Hamnah Fatima, Iqra Manzoor

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ultrasonography, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Doppler parameters of ophthalmic artery in women with preeclampsia: A meta-analysis.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Hemodynamic Insights into Preeclampsia: Comparing Ophthalmic and Uterine Artery Resistive Indices.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Syeda Rabi MadinaUniversity Institute of Radiological Sciences and Medical Imaging Technologies (UIRSMIT), Faculty of Allied Health Sciences (FAHS), University of Lahore , Lahaur , Pakistan.
Raham BachaUniversity Institute of Radiological Sciences and Medical Imaging Technologies (UIRSMIT), Faculty of Allied Health Sciences (FAHS), University of Lahore , Lahaur , Pakistan.
Syed Amir GilaniUniversity Institute of Radiological Sciences and Medical Imaging Technologies (UIRSMIT), Faculty of Allied Health Sciences (FAHS), University of Lahore , Lahaur , Pakistan.
Wafa FatimaUniversity Institute of Public Health (UIPH), Faculty of Allied Health Sciences (FAHS), University of Lahore , Lahaur , Pakistan.
Wahida AwaisGilani Ultrasound Center , Lahaur , Pakistan.
Hamnah FatimaUniversity Institute of Radiological Sciences and Medical Imaging Technologies (UIRSMIT), Faculty of Allied Health Sciences (FAHS), University of Lahore , Lahaur , Pakistan.
Iqra ManzoorUniversity Institute of Radiological Sciences and Medical Imaging Technologies (UIRSMIT), Faculty of Allied Health Sciences (FAHS), University of Lahore , Lahaur , Pakistan.
University of Lahore · PKUniversity of Health Sciences Lahore · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifiers

PMID32609969
PMCPMC7409544
OpenAlexW3036662004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.