Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32609836›Full record

ArticleEndocrinology2020

Differential Regulation and Targeting of Estrogen Receptor α Turnover in Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinoma.

Sreeja Sreekumar, Kevin M Levine, Matthew J Sikora, Jian Chen, Nilgun Tasdemir, Dorothy Carter, David J Dabbs, Carolin Meier, Ahmed Basudan, David Boone and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrinology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Transcriptomic Insights into Lobular Breast Cancer Biology and Patient Outcomes: Analysis of the MINDACT Clinical Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Sreeja SreekumarWomen's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Kevin M LevineWomen's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Matthew J SikoraWomen's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jian ChenWomen's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Nilgun TasdemirWomen's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Dorothy CarterWomen's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
David J DabbsWomen's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Carolin MeierWomen's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Ahmed BasudanWomen's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
David BooneWomen's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Priscilla F McAuliffeWomen's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Rachel C JankowitzWomen's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Adrian V LeeWomen's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jennifer M AtkinsonWomen's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Steffi OesterreichWomen's Cancer Research Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
University of Pittsburgh · USMagee-Womens Research Institute · US

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JOHN C. BYRD · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
WNT4 IN ENDOCRINE RESPONSE AND RESISTANCE IN INVASIVE LOBULAR CARCINOMAR00CA193734 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SIKORA, MATTHEW J · 2017 to 2019
$703k
Elucidating the function of WNT4 in endocrine response and resistance in invasive lobular carcinomaK99CA193734 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SIKORA, MATTHEW J · 2015 to 2016
$256k
Non-canonical FADD signaling as a genetic driver of invasive lobular carcinomaK99CA237736 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TASDEMIR, NILGUN · 2019 to 2020
$256k
Combination FGFR4 and ER-Targeted Therapy for Invasive Lobular CarcinomaF30CA203154 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LEVINE, KEVIN MAX · 2017 to 2020
$170k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA203154NCI NIH HHS K99 CA193734NCI NIH HHS K99 CA237736NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904NCI NIH HHS R00 CA193734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive lobular breast carcinoma (ILC) accounts for 10% to 15% of breast cancers diagnosed annually. Evidence suggests that some aspects of endocrine treatment response might differ between invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and ILC, and that patients with ILC have worse long-term survival. We analyzed The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset and observed lower levels of ESR1 mRNA (P = 0.002) and ERα protein (P = 0.038) in ER+ ILC (n = 137) compared to IDC (n = 554), and further confirmed the mRNA difference in a local UPMC cohort (ILC, n = 143; IDC, n = 877; P < 0.005). In both datasets, the correlation between ESR1 mRNA and ERα protein was weaker in ILC, suggesting differential post-transcriptional regulation of ERα. In vitro, 17β-estradiol (E2) decreased the rate of degradation and increased the half-life of ERα in ILC cell lines, whereas the opposite was observed in IDC cell lines. Further, E2 failed to induce robust ubiquitination of ERα in ILC cells. To determine the potential clinical relevance of these findings, we evaluated the effect of 2 selective estrogen receptor downregulators (SERDs), ICI 182,780 and AZD9496, on ERα turnover and cell growth. While ICI 182,780 and AZD9496 showed similar effects in IDC cells, in ILC cell lines, AZD9496 was not as effective as ICI 182,780 in decreasing ERα stability and E2-induced proliferation. Furthermore, AZD9496 exhibited partial agonist activity in growth assays in ILC cell lines. Our study provides evidence for a distinct ERα regulation by SERDs in ILC cell lines, and therefore it is important to include ILC models into preclinical and clinical testing of novel SERDs.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, LobularCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCell Line, TumorEstradiolEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMCF-7 CellsNeoplasm InvasivenessProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteolysisUbiquitinationESR1 protein, humanEstradiolEstrogen Receptor alphabreast cancerendocrine responseestrogen receptorinvasive lobular carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID32609836
PMCPMC7438704
OpenAlexW3039301238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.