Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32609728›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Insights into aphid prey consumption by ladybirds: Optimising field sampling methods and primer design for high throughput sequencing.

Lolita Ammann, Rosemary Moorhouse-Gann, Jordan Cuff, Colette Bertrand, Laia Mestre, Nicolás Pérez Hidalgo, Amy Ellison, Felix Herzog, Martin H Entling, Matthias Albrecht and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Complex landscapes, complex diets: DNA metabarcoding reveals lady beetle prey richness increases with landcover diversity.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lolita AmmannAgroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0766-8180
Rosemary Moorhouse-GannCardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5491-122X
Jordan CuffCardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0198-4940
Colette BertrandAgroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Zurich, Switzerland.
Laia MestreiES Landau, Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Koblenz-Landau, Landau, Germany.
Nicolás Pérez HidalgoInstituto de Biologia Integrativa de Sistemas (Centro Mixto Universidad de Valencia-CSIC) Valencia, Spain.
Amy EllisonSchool of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom.
Felix HerzogAgroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Zurich, Switzerland.
Martin H EntlingiES Landau, Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Koblenz-Landau, Landau, Germany.
Matthias AlbrechtAgroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Zurich, Switzerland.
William O C SymondsonCardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elucidating the diets of insect predators is important in basic and applied ecology, such as for improving the effectiveness of conservation biological control measures to promote natural enemies of crop pests. Here, we investigated the aphid diet of two common aphid predators in Central European agroecosystems, the native Coccinella septempunctata (Linnaeus) and the invasive Harmonia axyridis (Pallas; Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) by means of high throughput sequencing (HTS). For acquiring insights into diets of mobile flying insects at landscape scale minimizing trapping bias is important, which imposes methodological challenges for HTS. We therefore assessed the suitability of three field sampling methods (sticky traps, pan traps and hand-collection) as well as new aphid primers for identifying aphid prey consumption by coccinellids through HTS. The new aphid primers facilitate identification to species level in 75% of the European aphid genera investigated. Aphid primer specificity was high in silico and in vitro but low in environmental samples with the methods used, although this could be improved in future studies. For insect trapping we conclude that sticky traps are a suitable method in terms of minimizing sampling bias, contamination risk and trapping success, but compromise on DNA-recovery rate. The aphid diets of both field-captured ladybird species were dominated by Microlophium carnosum, the common nettle aphid. Another common prey was Sitobion avenae (cereal aphid), which got more often detected in C. septempunctata compared to H. axyridis. Around one third of the recovered aphid taxa were common crop pests. We conclude that sampling methodologies need constant revision but that our improved aphid primers offer currently one of the best solutions for broad screenings of coccinellid predation on aphids.

Indexed as

Food ChainPredatory BehaviorAnimal FeedAnimalsAphidsColeopteraDNAHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingIntroduced SpeciesSpecies SpecificityDNA

Identifiers

PMID32609728
PMCPMC7329105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.