Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32609330›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2020

Consequences of Cryopreservation in Diverse Natural Isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Kieslana M Wing, Mark A Phillips, Andrew R Baker, Molly K Burke

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Biopreserving Pathogens: Promise & Peril.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Loss of Heterozygosity and Its Importance in Evolution.Journal of molecular evolution · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kieslana M WingDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis.
Mark A PhillipsDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis.
Andrew R BakerDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis.
Molly K BurkeDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis.
Oregon State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental evolution allows the observation of change over time as laboratory populations evolve in response to novel, controlled environments. Microbial evolution experiments take advantage of cryopreservation to archive experimental populations in glycerol media, creating a frozen, living "fossil" record. Prior research with Escherichia coli has shown that cryopreservation conditions can affect cell viability and that allele frequencies across the genome can change in response to a freeze-thaw event. We expand on these observations by characterizing fitness and genomic consequences of multiple freeze-thaw cycles in diploid yeast populations. Our study system is a highly recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae population (SGRP-4X) that harbors standing genetic variation that cryopreservation may threaten. We also investigate the four parental isogenic strains crossed to create the SGRP-4X. We measure cell viability over five consecutive freeze-thaw cycles; whereas we find that viability increases over time in the evolved recombinant populations, we observe no such viability improvements in the parental strains. We also collect genome-wide sequence data from experimental populations initially, after one freeze-thaw, and after five freeze-thaw cycles. In the recombinant evolved populations, we find a region of significant allele frequency change on chromosome 15 containing the ALR1 gene. In the parental strains, we find little evidence for new mutations. We conclude that cryopreserving yeast populations with standing genetic variation may have both phenotypic and genomic consequences, though the same cryopreservation practices may have only small impacts on populations with little or no initial variation.

Indexed as

CryopreservationSaccharomyces cerevisiaeCation Transport ProteinsGene FrequencyGenetic FitnessGenetic VariationGlycerolSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsALR1 protein, S cerevisiaeCation Transport ProteinsGlycerolSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteinsexperimental evolutionfreeze−thawglycerolpool-seqstanding genetic variation

Identifiers

PMID32609330
PMCPMC7508203
OpenAlexW3039235807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.