Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32609322›Full record

ArticleJAMA dermatology2020

Assessment of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (cSCC) In situ Incidence and the Risk of Developing Invasive cSCC in Patients With Prior cSCC In situ vs the General Population in the Netherlands, 1989-2017.

Selin Tokez, Marlies Wakkee, Marieke Louwman, Eline Noels, Tamar Nijsten, Loes Hollestein

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for Bowen's disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frequency and timing of multiple skin cancer development in five cohorts.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Skin health of community-living older people: a scoping review.Archives of dermatological research · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The effects of exposure to solar radiation on human health.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Interventions After First Post-Transplant Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Proposed Decision Framework.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Environmental effects of stratospheric ozone depletion, UV radiation, and interactions with climate change: UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, Update 2020.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Selin TokezDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Marlies WakkeeDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Marieke LouwmanDepartment of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Eline NoelsDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Tamar NijstenDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Loes HollesteinDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The incidence rates of keratinocyte cancer are increasing globally; however, the incidence rates of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) in situ and the risk of developing subsequent invasive cSCC remain unknown. Objective: To estimate annual population-based age-standardized incidence rates of histopathologically confirmed cSCC in situ stratified by sex, age, and body site and to assess the risk of developing invasive cSCC among patients with cSCC in situ compared with the general population. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide epidemiological population-based cohort study used cancer registry data to identify all patients with a first incident of histopathologically confirmed cSCC in situ between January 1, 1989, and December 31, 2017. In addition, all patients with cSCC in situ who subsequently had a first incident of invasive cSCC were identified up to June 11, 2019. Data were analyzed between March 18 and November 12, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Age-standardized incidence rates per year for cSCC in situ, standardized to the 2013 edition of the European Standard Population, were calculated by sex, age, and body site. Cumulative risks, standardized incidence ratios, and absolute excess risks were calculated to assess the risk of invasive cSCC in patients with cSCC in situ compared with the general population. Results: In this population-based cohort study of 88 754 patients with a first incident of cSCC in situ between January 1, 1989, and December 31, 2017, 58.8% were women; the median age was 75 years (interquartile range [IQR], 67-82 years) for women and 73 years (IQR, 65-80 years) for men. Increasing incidence rates were observed, with the highest incidence rates in 2017 among women in general (71.7 cases per 100 000 person-years) and among men 80 years and older (540.9 cases per 100 000 person-years). The most common body site among women was the face (15.9 cases per 100 000 person-years) and among men was the scalp and/or neck (12.3 cases per 100 000 person-years). After 5 years of follow-up, among patients with cSCC in situ, the cumulative risk of developing an invasive cSCC at any anatomic location was 11.7% (95% CI, 11.6%-11.9%) in men and 6.9% (95% CI, 6.8%-7.0%) in women (P < .001). The standardized incidence ratio was highest in the first year of follow-up among both men (16.6; 95% CI, 15.7-17.5) and women (15.1; 95% CI, 14.2-16.1). Conclusions and Relevance: This study reports the first nationwide incidence rates of cSCC in situ to date. The increasing incidence rates of cSCC in situ and the high risk of developing invasive cSCC among patients with cSCC in situ may increase the health care burden associated with precursors of keratinocyte cancer and highlight the need to include cutaneous skin cancer precursor lesions when exploring policies to address skin cancer care.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionAge FactorsCarcinoma in SituCarcinoma, Squamous CellFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNetherlandsRegistriesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID32609322
PMCPMC7330830
OpenAlexW3040078004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.