Management of benign and suspicious breast lesions during the coronavirus disease pandemic: recommendations for triage and treatment.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Fear, anxiety, and knowledge levels of women who underwent gynecologic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024
   Article
2. Non-oncological gynecological diagnoses in a women's health care service during the pandemic caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2.PloS one · 2023
   Article
3. Clinical application of ultrasound-guided thoracic nerve block in the operation of benign breast tumors.American journal of translational research · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as