Satisfaction With Outdoor Activities Among Northeastern U.S. Newly Enrolled Long-Term Services and Supports Recipients.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Toward a proposal for a national strategy for access to outdoor stays in residential care facilities for older adults in Sweden.Frontiers in psychology · 2026
   Article
2. Predictors of change over time in satisfaction with outdoor activities ratings among long-term care services and supports recipients.Geriatric nursing (New York, N.Y.)
   Article
3. The role of aesthetics in promoting health-related quality of life for older adults transitioning to long-term services and support.Geriatric nursing (New York, N.Y.)
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as