Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32608209›Full record

ArticleYonsei medical journal2020

Inequality in Life Expectancy in Korea according to Various Categorizations of the National Health Insurance Premiums as a Marker of Income.

Jinwook Bahk, Hee Yeon Kang, Young Ho Khang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jinwook BahkDepartment of Public Health, Keimyung University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7715-9955
Hee Yeon KangDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8530-8087
Young Ho KhangDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9585-8266

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute HI18C0446National Research Foundation of Korea 2017R1C1B5017747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the degree to which the magnitude of income inequality in life expectancy according to different categorization across beneficiary types under the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) in Korea. We used population and death data in 2017 from the National Health Information Database of the NHIS. Income quintile groups were classified in four ways according to beneficiary type (employee insured, self-employed insured, and Medical Aid beneficiaries). Standard life table procedures were used to calculate life expectancy. The life expectancy gap between the lowest and highest income quintiles was the largest when the entire population was divided into quintiles without distinguishing among types of beneficiaries. In conclusion, we suggest that income quintile indicators in NHIS data, measured without distinguishing among types of beneficiaries, may best represent the magnitude of health inequalities in Korean society. This indicator could be used for future research on health inequalities, as well as for monitoring health inequalities in Korea.

Indexed as

Health PolicyHealth Status DisparitiesLife ExpectancyDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansIncomeMaleNational Health ProgramsRepublic of KoreaSocioeconomic Factorshealth policyLife expectancyNational Health Insurancesocioeconomic factors

Identifiers

PMID32608209
PMCPMC7329743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.