Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32608090›Full record

ArticleChemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2020

N-Heterocyclic Carbene Organocatalysis: With or Without Carbenes?

Sascha Gehrke, Oldamur Hollóczki

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. N-Heterocyclic Carbene Organocatalysis: With or Without Carbenes?Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sascha GehrkeMulliken Center for Theoretical Chemistry, University of Bonn, Beringstr. 4+6, 53115, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9298-6510
Oldamur HollóczkiMulliken Center for Theoretical Chemistry, University of Bonn, Beringstr. 4+6, 53115, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3105-7176
University of Bonn · DE

Funding

BMBF LuCaMag
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work the mechanism of the aldehyde umpolung reactions, catalyzed by azolium cations in the presence of bases, was studied through computational methods. Next to the mechanism established by Breslow in the 1950s that takes effect through the formation of a free carbene, we have suggested that these processes can follow a concerted asynchronous path, in which the azolium cation directly reacts with the substrate, avoiding the formation of the carbene intermediate. We hereby show that substituting the azolium cation, and varying the base or the substrate do not affect the preference for the concerted reaction mechanism. The concerted path was found to exhibit low barriers also for the reactions of thiamine with model substrates, showing that this path might have biological relevance. The dominance of the concerted mechanism can be explained through the specific structure of the key transition state, avoiding the liberation of the highly reactive, and thus unstable carbene lone pair, whereas activating the substrate through hydrogen-bonding interactions. Polar and hydrogen-bonding solvents, as well as the presence of the counterions of the azolium salts facilitate the reaction through carbenes, bringing the barriers of the two reaction mechanisms closer, in many cases making the concerted path less favorable. Thus, our data show that by choosing the exact components in a reaction, the mechanism can be switched to occur with or without carbenes.

Indexed as

density functional calculationsN-heterocyclic carbenesorganocatalysisreaction mechanismsumpolung

Identifiers

PMID32608090
PMCPMC7496998
OpenAlexW3039662081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.