Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32607865›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2021

Clinical determinants of low handgrip strength and its decline in the oldest old: the Leiden 85-plus Study.

Carolina H Y Ling, Jacobijn Gussekloo, Stella Trompet, Carel G M Meskers, Andrea B Maier

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hand grip strength and loss of independence in Indigenous and non-Indigenous New Zealand octogenarians-the LiLACS NZ cohort study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Carolina H Y LingInternal Medicine Department, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2644-7532
Jacobijn GusseklooDepartment of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7186-8278
Stella TrompetDepartment of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5006-0528
Carel G M MeskersDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, de Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5056-5611
Andrea B MaierDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.b.maier@vu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7206-1724
Leiden University Medical Center · NLAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AU

Funding

Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport 1997-2001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAge-related decline in muscle strength, dynapenia, is linked to serious adverse health outcomes. Evidence on the determinants of muscle strength decline in the oldest old is lacking.

aimsTo identify clinical variables associated with handgrip strength and its change over a 4-year period in an oldest old cohort.

methodsWe included 555 participants from the Leiden 85-plus Study, a prospective population-based study of 85-year-old inhabitants of Leiden, the Netherlands. Handgrip strength was assessed at age 85 and 89 years. Anthropometry, mental status, functional performance, and biochemical variables were obtained at baselines. Significant univariates were included into multivariable regression models to extract the final predictive variables.

resultsHandgrip strength for men and women at age 85 years was 30.6 kg (SD 8.2) and 18.7 kg (SD, 5.5), respectively. In the cross-sectional analysis, body height and weight were positively associated with handgrip strength in both genders. Higher functional performance was associated with stronger handgrip strength in women. Mean absolute handgrip strength decline over 4 years was greater for men than women (- 6.1 kg (SD, 5.2) vs. - 3.4 kg (SD, 4.1), p < 0.001). Men with better baseline cognitive functioning had smaller decline in handgrip strength.

conclusionsThis study further strengthens evidence linking functional and cognitive performances to muscle strength in the oldest old. Future research is needed to ascertain causality and determine if these markers represent potential targets for intervention.

Indexed as

Hand StrengthMuscle StrengthAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsProspective StudiesCognitive functionMuscle strengthPhysical fitnessSex differences

Identifiers

PMID32607865
PMCPMC8081703
OpenAlexW3039236862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.