Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32607775›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2021

Closed reduction techniques for acute anterior shoulder dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Huan Dong, Edward A Jenner, Kanthan Theivendran

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Effects of reduction technique for acute anterior shoulder dislocation without sedation or intra-articular pain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Management of a first-time shoulder dislocation in the athlete: From ER to OR.Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013) · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Closed shoulder reduction by glenohumeral joint distraction. A technical note.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Huan DongTrauma and Orthopaedic Department, Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Lyndon, West Bromwich, Birmingham, West Midlands, B71 4HJ, UK. dongh100@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1596-2427
Edward A JennerTrauma and Orthopaedic Department, Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Lyndon, West Bromwich, Birmingham, West Midlands, B71 4HJ, UK.
Kanthan TheivendranTrauma and Orthopaedic Department, Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Lyndon, West Bromwich, Birmingham, West Midlands, B71 4HJ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6740-3400
Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnterior shoulder dislocations are the most common type of joint dislocation with the majority treated with closed reduction. Reduction methods can be grouped into their principle mode of action: traction-countertraction, leverage and scapular manipulation. The best method has yet to be identified and our aim was to find the most effective, safe and least painful method of closed reduction for acute anterior shoulder dislocations.

methodsA search of the online databases of CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase was performed to identify randomised control trials (RCTs) comparing closed reduction methods for anterior shoulder dislocations. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

resultsTwelve eligible RCTs were included with a total of 1055 patients. Our meta-analysis showed traction-countertraction methods are marginally less painful than leverage methods by 0.86 points on the VAS scale but leverage methods are quicker by 20 s. Amongst traction-countertraction methods, the Spaso technique was the least painful and quickest, albeit with no difference in overall success rate. A meta-analysis was not possible for comparisons involving scapular manipulation due to the paucity of studies, but within two studies, scapular manipulation was significantly less painful than both leverage and traction-countertraction methods by 1.5 and 2.3 points (VAS), respectively.

conclusionTraction-countertraction methods are less painful but slower than leverage methods with no difference in complication rates. However, there was no difference in overall reduction success rate between any of the groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Indexed as

Manipulation, OrthopedicShoulder DislocationHumansScapulaShoulderTractionClosedDislocationMeta-analysisReductionReviewShoulder

Identifiers

PMID32607775
OpenAlexW3040470215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.