ArticleJournal of medical systems2020
Detection of COVID-19 Infection from Routine Blood Exams with Machine Learning: A Feasibility Study.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 137 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
137 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 353 citations in OpenAlex.
- The accuracy of machine learning approaches using non-image data for the prediction of COVID-19: A meta-analysis.International journal of medical informatics · 2022Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence Applications for COVID-19 in Intensive Care and Emergency Settings: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Machine learning application for the prediction of SARS-CoV-2 infection using blood tests and chest radiograph.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Development and validation of a cross-sectional risk screening nomogram for carotid plaque based on routine health examination data and the triglyceride-glucose-waist-to-hip ratio.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Optimizing cardiovascular disease diagnosis through machine learning models integrating oxidized low-density lipoprotein and routine clinical indicators.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Mission imputable: Effects of missing data processing on infectious disease detection and prognosis.PloS one · 2026Article
- Identification of right ventricular dysfunction with LogNNet based diagnostic model: A comparative study with supervised ML algorithms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Topological data analysis and machine learning for COVID-19 detection in CT scan lung images.BMC biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- The value of common blood parameters for the differential diagnosis of respiratory tract infections in children.AMB Express · 2025Article
- Utilizing machine learning to predict hospital admissions for pediatric COVID-19 patients (PrepCOVID-Machine).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Direct detection and identification of viruses in saliva using a SpecID ionization modified mass spectrometer.PloS one · 2025Article
- Developing a machine learning model with enhanced performance for predicting COVID-19 from patients presenting to the emergency room with acute respiratory symptoms.IET systems biology · 2024Article
- Removing Adversarial Noise in X-ray Images via Total Variation Minimization and Patch-Based Regularization for Robust Deep Learning-based Diagnosis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Advantages of Metabolomics-Based Multivariate Machine Learning to Predict Disease Severity: Example of COVID.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Microfluidic Immunoarray for Point-of-Care Detection of Cytokines in COVID-19 Patients.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Comparing machine learning screening approaches using clinical data and cytokine profiles for COVID-19 in resource-limited and resource-abundant settings.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Microbial Diagnosis.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Deep self-supervised machine learning algorithms with a novel feature elimination and selection approaches for blood test-based multi-dimensional health risks classification.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Harnessing of Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Infections: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
77 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemia due to the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, in its first 4 months since its outbreak, has to date reached more than 200 countries worldwide with more than 2 million confirmed cases (probably a much higher number of infected), and almost 200,000 deaths. Amplification of viral RNA by (real time) reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) is the current gold standard test for confirmation of infection, although it presents known shortcomings: long turnaround times (3-4 hours to generate results), potential shortage of reagents, false-negative rates as large as 15-20%, the need for certified laboratories, expensive equipment and trained personnel. Thus there is a need for alternative, faster, less expensive and more accessible tests. We developed two machine learning classification models using hematochemical values from routine blood exams (namely: white blood cells counts, and the platelets, CRP, AST, ALT, GGT, ALP, LDH plasma levels) drawn from 279 patients who, after being admitted to the San Raffaele Hospital (Milan, Italy) emergency-room with COVID-19 symptoms, were screened with the rRT-PCR test performed on respiratory tract specimens. Of these patients, 177 resulted positive, whereas 102 received a negative response. We have developed two machine learning models, to discriminate between patients who are either positive or negative to the SARS-CoV-2: their accuracy ranges between 82% and 86%, and sensitivity between 92% e 95%, so comparably well with respect to the gold standard. We also developed an interpretable Decision Tree model as a simple decision aid for clinician interpreting blood tests (even off-line) for COVID-19 suspect cases. This study demonstrated the feasibility and clinical soundness of using blood tests analysis and machine learning as an alternative to rRT-PCR for identifying COVID-19 positive patients. This is especially useful in those countries, like developing ones, suffering from shortages of rRT-PCR reagents and specialized laboratories. We made available a Web-based tool for clinical reference and evaluation (This tool is available at https://covid19-blood-ml.herokuapp.com/ ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.