Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32607611›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2020

Connectome mapping with edge density imaging differentiates pediatric mild traumatic brain injury from typically developing controls: proof of concept.

Cyrus A Raji, Maxwell B Wang, NhuNhu Nguyen, Julia P Owen, Eva M Palacios, Esther L Yuh, Pratik Mukherjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cyrus A Raji *Neural Connectivity Laboratory, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 185 Berry St., Suite 350, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA. cyrusraji@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9086-0105
Maxwell B Wang *Neural Connectivity Laboratory, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 185 Berry St., Suite 350, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
NhuNhu NguyenNeural Connectivity Laboratory, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 185 Berry St., Suite 350, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Julia P OwenNeural Connectivity Laboratory, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 185 Berry St., Suite 350, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Eva M PalaciosNeural Connectivity Laboratory, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 185 Berry St., Suite 350, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Esther L YuhNeural Connectivity Laboratory, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 185 Berry St., Suite 350, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Pratik MukherjeeNeural Connectivity Laboratory, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 185 Berry St., Suite 350, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (KL2) KL2TR002346 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Dominic N Reeds · 2017 to 2026
$14.0M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesKL2TR000450 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$8.8M
Biomedical Imaging for Clinician ScientistsT32EB001631 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI THOMAS M LINK · 2005 to 2026
$5.6M
Macrostructural and Microstructural Imaging Biomarkers of Traumatic Brain InjuryR01NS060776 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MUKHERJEE, PRATIK · 2009 to 2012
$1.8M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000450NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002346NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB001631NIH HHS KL2 TR000450NIH HHS R01 NS060776NIH HHS T32 EB001631NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough acute neurologic impairment might be transient, other long-term effects can be observed with mild traumatic brain injury. However, when pediatric patients with mild traumatic brain injury present for medical care, conventional imaging with CT and MR imaging often does not reveal abnormalities.

objectiveTo determine whether edge density imaging can separate pediatric mild traumatic brain injury from typically developing controls. MATERIALS AND

methodsSubjects were recruited as part of the "Therapeutic Resources for Attention Improvement using Neuroimaging in Traumatic Brain Injury" (TRAIN-TBI) study. We included 24 adolescents (χ=14.1 years of age, σ=1.6 years, range 10-16 years), 14 with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 10 typically developing controls. Neurocognitive assessments included the pediatric version of the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) and the Attention Network Task (ANT). Diffusion MR imaging was acquired on a 3-tesla (T) scanner. Edge density images were computed utilizing fiber tractography. Principal component analysis (PCA) and support vector machines (SVM) were used in an exploratory analysis to separate mild TBI and control groups. The diagnostic accuracy of edge density imaging, neurocognitive tests, and fractional anisotropy (FA) from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was computed with two-sample t-tests and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) metrics.

resultsSupport vector machine-principal component analysis of edge density imaging maps identified three white matter regions distinguishing pediatric mild TBI from controls. The bilateral tapetum, sagittal stratum, and callosal splenium identified mild TBI subjects with sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 100%. Accuracy from the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 94%. Neurocognitive testing provided an AUC of 61% (CVLT) and 71% (ANT). Fractional anisotropy yielded an AUC of 48%.

conclusionIn this proof-of-concept study, we show that edge density imaging is a new form of connectome mapping that provides better diagnostic delineation between pediatric mild TBI and healthy controls than DTI or neurocognitive assessments of memory or attention.

Indexed as

ConnectomeAdolescentAnisotropyBrain Injuries, TraumaticCase-Control StudiesChildDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansMaleMental Status and Dementia TestsNeuroimagingPrincipal Component AnalysisProof of Concept StudyProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexBrainChildrenConcussionDiffusion tensor imagingEdge density imagingMagnetic resonance imagingTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID32607611
PMCPMC7501221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.