Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32607539›Full record

ArticleDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2020

Multicenter study on the diagnostic performance of multiframe volumetric laser endomicroscopy targets for Barrett's esophagus neoplasia with histopathology correlation.

M R Struyvenberg, A J de Groof, A Kahn, B L A M Weusten, D E Fleischer, E K Ganguly, V J A Konda, C J Lightdale, D K Pleskow, A Sethi and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

M R StruyvenbergDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
A J de GroofDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
A KahnDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
B L A M WeustenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
D E FleischerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
E K GangulyDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, USA.
V J A KondaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
C J LightdaleDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
D K PleskowDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
A SethiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
M S SmithDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mount Sinai West and Mount Sinai St. Luke's Hospitals, New York, NY, USA.
A J TrindadeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
M B WallaceDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, NY, USA.
H C WolfsenDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, NY, USA.
G J TearneyDepartment of Pathology, Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
S L MeijerDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
C L LeggettDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
J J G H M BergmanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
W L CurversDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLMayo Clinic in Arizona · USWinnMed · USBaylor University Medical Center · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USLong Island Jewish Medical Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLSt. Luke's Hospital · USUniversity of Vermont Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE) has been shown to improve detection of early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus (BE). However, diagnostic performance using histopathology-correlated VLE regions of interest (ROIs) has not been adequately studied. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of VLE assessors for identification of early BE neoplasia in histopathology-correlated VLE ROIs. In total, 191 ROIs (120 nondysplastic and 71 neoplastic) from 50 BE patients were evaluated in a random order using a web-based module. All ROIs contained histopathology correlations enabled by VLE laser marking. Assessors were blinded to endoscopic BE images and histology. ROIs were first scored as nondysplastic or neoplastic. Level of confidence was assigned to the predicted diagnosis. Outcome measures were: (i) diagnostic performance of VLE assessors for identification of BE neoplasia in all VLE ROIs, defined as accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity; (ii) diagnostic performance of VLE assessors for only high level of confidence predictions; and (iii) interobserver agreement. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for BE neoplasia identification were 79% (confidence interval [CI], 75-83), 75% (CI, 71-79), and 81% (CI, 76-86), respectively. When neoplasia was identified with a high level of confidence, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 88%, 83%, and 90%, respectively. The overall strength of interobserver agreement was fair (k = 0.29). VLE assessors can identify BE neoplasia with reasonable diagnostic accuracy in histopathology-correlated VLE ROIs, and accuracy is enhanced when BE neoplasia is identified with high level of confidence. Future work should focus on renewed VLE image reviewing criteria and real-time automatic assessment of VLE scans.

Indexed as

Barrett EsophagusEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagoscopyHumansLasersMicroscopy, ConfocalBarrett’s esophagusearly esophageal cancerendoscopic imagingesophageal adenocarcinomaoptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID32607539
PMCPMC7720006
OpenAlexW3038813577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.