ArticleJAMIA open2020
Acceptability of smartphone applications for facilitating layperson naloxone administration during opioid overdoses.
Article in JAMIA open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06466005 (UnityPhilly Response App for Overdose Reversal), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
UnityPhilly Response App for Overdose Reversal: Assessing Citywide Effectiveness and Sustainability
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recruiting a National Sample of First Response Agencies to Participate in an Overdose Prevention Research Project: Randomized Controlled Trial and Feasibility Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Trial
- Users' Acceptability and Perceived Efficacy of mHealth for Opioid Use Disorder: Scoping Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Article
- The Feasibility of Using the National PulsePoint Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Responder Network to Facilitate Overdose Education and Naloxone Distribution: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- The acceptability of overdose alert and response technologies: introducing the TPOM-ODART framework.Harm reduction journal · 2023Article
- Overdose Alert and Response Technologies: State-of-the-art Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Review
- Overdose Detection Technologies to Reduce Solitary Overdose Deaths: A Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- A pilot study of a mixed-method approach to design an ED-based peer mHealth referral tool for HIV/HCV and opioid overdose prevention services.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2022Article
- Decision-making by laypersons equipped with an emergency response smartphone app for opioid overdose.The International journal on drug policy · 2021Article
- Human Factors and Organizational Issues in Health Informatics: Innovations and Opportunities.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2021Review
- Willingness to use a wearable device capable of detecting and reversing overdose among people who use opioids in Philadelphia.Harm reduction journal · 2021Article
- Layperson reversal of opioid overdose supported by smartphone alert: A prospective observational cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2020Article
- Naloxone analogy and opioid overdose terminology preferences among rural caregivers: Differences by race.Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhAArticle
- Empowering communities with a smartphone-based response network for opioid overdoses.IEEE pervasive computingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe investigated user requirements for a smartphone application to coordinate layperson administration of naloxone during an opioid overdose. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted interviews and focus groups with 19 nonmedical opioid users and other community members in the Kensington neighborhood of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, which has one of the highest overdose rates in the country. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.
resultsWe found high levels of trust and reliance within one's own social group, especially nonmedical opioid users and members of the neighborhood. Participants distrusted outsiders, including professional responders, whom they perceived as uncaring and prejudiced. Participants expressed some concern over malicious use of a location-based application, such as theft when a victim is unconscious, but overall felt the benefits could outweigh the risks. Participants also trusted community-based organizations providing services such as bystander training and naloxone distribution, and felt that a smartphone application should be integrated into these services. DISCUSSION: Individuals affected by opioid use and overdose reacted positively to the concept for a smartphone application, which they perceived as a useful tool that could help combat the high rate of opioid overdose fatalities in their neighborhood. A sense of unity with others who have shared their experiences could be leveraged to connect willing bystanders with victims of overdose, but risk must be mitigated for layperson responders.
conclusionBased on participant experiences with overdoses, trust-based considerations for the design of smartphone applications to facilitate layperson response will be critical for their adoption and use in real overdose situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.