ArticlePeerJ2020
Whole-genome sequence analyses of
Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global whole-genome, phylodynamic, and machine-learning analysis ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Evidence for Genotype-Associated Differences in Disease Severity and Limitations of Serotype-Based Classification inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Genomic insights into diversity, antimicrobial resistance and virulence ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Transcriptional profile ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Genomic insight into the diversity ofmSphere · 2024Article
- Virulence and Antimicrobial Resistance Characterization ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Recommendation of a standardized broth microdilution method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2024Article
- Detection of antimicrobial resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Molecular characterization of Glaesserella parasuis strains circulating in North American swine production systems.BMC veterinary research · 2023Article
- Identification ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
methodsThe whole-genome sequence of a ST328 isolate from diseased swine in China was determined using Pacbio RS II and Illumina MiSeq platforms and compared with 54 isolates from China sequenced in this study and 39 strains from China and eigtht other countries sequenced by previously. Patterns of genetic variation, antibiotic resistance, and virulence mechanisms were investigated in relation to the phylogeny of the isolates. Electrotransformation experiments were performed to confirm the ability of pYL1-a plasmid observed in ST328-to confer antibiotic resistance.
resultsThe ST328 genome contained a novel Tn
conclusionsOur comparative genomic analysis of worldwide
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.