Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32607236›Full record

ArticleBiomedical reports2020

Comparison of protease and aminopeptidase activities in meconium: A pilot study.

Ewa Skarżyńska, Paulina Wilczyńska, Bartosz Kiersztyn, Joanna Żytyńska-Daniluk, Artur Jakimiuk, Barbara Lisowska-Myjak

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ewa SkarżyńskaDepartment of Biochemistry and Clinical Chemistry, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw 02-097, Poland.
Paulina WilczyńskaDepartment of Biochemistry, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Warsaw 02-776, Poland.
Bartosz KiersztynMicrobial Ecology and Environmental Biotechnology Department, Institute of Botany, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw; Biological and Chemical Research Centre, Warsaw 02-089, Poland.
Joanna Żytyńska-DanilukClinical Department of Obstetrics, Female Diseases and Gynaecological Oncology, Central Clinical Hospital of The Ministry of The Interior, Warsaw 02-507, Poland.
Artur JakimiukReproductive Health Department, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw 01-211, Poland.
Barbara Lisowska-MyjakDepartment of Biochemistry and Clinical Chemistry, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw 02-097, Poland.
Medical University of Warsaw · PLCentral Clinical Hospital · PLUniversity of Warsaw · PLWarsaw University of Life Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The successive accumulation of proteases and aminopeptidases in meconium are important physiological components of the intrauterine environment in which a fetus develops. The aim of the present study was to assess the changes in the activities of these enzymes in meconium of healthy infants, and to investigate whether there were any statistically significant associations between activity of the enzymes of interest and the mode of delivery. The activities of proteases and aminopeptidases were determined in meconium portions (n=110) using the substrates BODIPY FL casein and L-leucine-7-amido-4-methylcoumarin hydrochloride, respectively. Serial meconium samples (2-5 per neonate) were collected from healthy infants born vaginally (n=14), and by a cesarean section (n=16). Protease activity (10

Indexed as

activityaminopeptidasescesareanmeconiumparturitionproteasesvaginal birth

Identifiers

PMID32607236
PMCPMC7323450
OpenAlexW3034563740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.