Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32607220›Full record

ReviewEcology and evolution2020

Evaluating cetacean body condition; a review of traditional approaches and new developments.

Juliana Castrillon, Susan Bengtson Nash

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Successful Rescue of a Juvenile Humpback Whale (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Physical Measures of Welfare in Fin (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Climate change and cetacean health: impacts and future directions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Key questions in marine mammal bioenergetics.Conservation physiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Juliana CastrillonSouthern Ocean Persistent Organic Pollutants Program Environmental Futures Research Institute (EFRI) Griffith University Nathan Qld. Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1905-7344
Susan Bengtson NashSouthern Ocean Persistent Organic Pollutants Program Environmental Futures Research Institute (EFRI) Griffith University Nathan Qld. Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5928-0850

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to accurately gauge the body condition of free-swimming cetaceans is invaluable in population and conservation biology, due to the direct implications that this measure has on individual fitness, survival, and reproductive success. Furthermore, monitoring temporal change in body condition offers insight into foraging success over time, and therefore the health of the supporting ecosystem, as well as a species' resilience. These parameters are particularly relevant in the context of widespread and accelerated, climate-induced habitat change. There are, however, significant logistical challenges involved with research and monitoring of large cetaceans, which often preclude direct measure of body condition of live individuals. Consequently, a wide variety of indirect approaches, or proxies, for estimating energetic stores have been proposed over past decades. To date, no single, standardized, approach has been shown to serve as a robust estimation of body condition across species, age categories, and in both live and dead individuals. Nonetheless, it is clear that streamlining and advancing body condition measures would carry significant benefits for diverse areas of cetacean research and management. Here, we review traditional approaches and new applications for the evaluation of cetacean energetic reserves. Specific attention is given to the criteria of measure performance (sensitivity and accuracy), level of invasiveness, cost and effort required for implementation, as well as versatility e.g. applicability across different species, age groups, as well as living versus deceased animals. Measures have been benchmarked against these criteria in an effort to identify key candidates for further development, and key research priorities in the field.

Indexed as

blubber measuresbody conditionCetaceansenergetic healthindividual fitnessPopulation monitoring

Identifiers

PMID32607220
PMCPMC7319165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.